-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes planning performance #147
Fixes planning performance #147
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
while (ros::Time::now() - start_time < ros::Duration(3.0)) | ||
loop_rate.sleep(); | ||
|
||
ros::Duration(3.0).sleep(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems worthwhile to log a message saying that it is sleeping (and why).
I'm assuming this is somehow related to ensuring the goal is delivered to the remote robot through the generic bridge? If so, it's not clear to me why it would help. I thought that the bridge didn't start establishing connections for a new message topic/type until the first message was received, so a delay in between creating the publisher and publishing the first message wouldn't help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add a comment on this. When you declare a publisher you have to sleep a bit before publishing a message. This is not an issue when there is a connected_callback involved, but since we're doing remote commanding and waving that requirement, without this, the goal is not published. I can also lower the time involved, in retrospect 3s is too much..
astrobee/survey_manager/survey_planner/data/jem_survey_static.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Closes #142 |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment about exit codes...
Signed-off-by: Marina Moreira <[email protected]>
I applied your patch and will rebase your PR if needed to merge asap |
As we discussed earlier, I liked your suggestion of merging my PR into this one. Just will save some hassle with rebasing my PR if your PR goes in with squash-and-merge. |
fixing inspection tool reading input and exiting
better performance in simulation
cleaning output
adding localization attitudes to jem static