Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use deployment for sentinel #36

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

jiayouxujin
Copy link
Collaborator

@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin commented Jun 12, 2023

Hi,
This PR is for using deployment for sentinel.

Since the sentinel does not need to be a stateful service, we can use a deployment to deploy the sentinel. Meanwhile, the redis-operator also uses the same approach.

the related issues are #13 #37 #38 .

@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin force-pushed the deployment-for-sentinel branch from 41a429b to 2ab9ad1 Compare June 18, 2023 12:57
@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2023 11:22
@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin changed the title [WIP] feat: use deployment for sentinel feat: use deployment for sentinel Jun 29, 2023
@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin force-pushed the deployment-for-sentinel branch from c2aa11b to b111a8c Compare July 12, 2023 14:00
@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin force-pushed the deployment-for-sentinel branch from 4a33695 to 87a2474 Compare July 31, 2023 09:41
@@ -15,841 +15,1084 @@ spec:
singular: kvrocks
scope: Namespaced
versions:
- additionalPrinterColumns:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this file only have a few differences after rebasing and resolving conflicts? @jiayouxujin

@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin force-pushed the deployment-for-sentinel branch from 87a2474 to 554d228 Compare August 9, 2023 09:24
@jiayouxujin jiayouxujin merged commit e51f365 into RocksLabs:unstable Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants