Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use CommonMark in convert-policy.py #295

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 10, 2020
Merged

Use CommonMark in convert-policy.py #295

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 10, 2020

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Mar 7, 2020

This fixes a few subtle issues and is a prerequisite for fixing more.

This fixes a few subtle issues and is a pre-requisite for fixing more.
@annevk annevk requested a review from domenic March 7, 2020 11:21
@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Mar 7, 2020

whatwg/sg#104 should probably land first. The commits in #294 can be used to review the effect of this. I ended up cleaning up the code a bit further compared to that, but I promise there's no difference in output.

@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Mar 7, 2020

I'm not sure if this fixes #145 as regular expressions confuse me a ton.

It does seem that switching to using Python 3 is fine and this would fix #264 therefore.

@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Mar 9, 2020

This should close #291 as well.

convert-policy.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
convert-policy.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
convert-policy.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Mar 9, 2020

Feedback addressed.

@annevk annevk requested a review from domenic March 9, 2020 19:40
@annevk annevk merged commit 021c833 into master Mar 10, 2020
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/commonmark branch March 10, 2020 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants