-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HTTPS upgrades proposal #1655
Open
carlosjoan91
wants to merge
4
commits into
whatwg:main
Choose a base branch
from
carlosjoan91:httpsupgrades
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
HTTPS upgrades proposal #1655
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So why isn't the HTTPS Upgrade opt-out mechanism defined in this spec or uselessly vauge? What if a site serves 2 different views or groups of assets, for clear vs TLS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally that's considered a bug in the website at this point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/cAS525en8XE/m/jAAG2CIPBgAJ a user reported a Polish LTE ISP, offers the UA subscriber's ISP specific GUID (lets ignore privacy) through a clear HTTP 1.1 ISP addon req header (MITM clear proxy), so a site has to downgrade to clear, capture the customer's ISP subscriber GUID, then redirect back to HTTPS, then on backend, submit LTE subscriber GUID+server's 3rd party api key->bill UA's LTE account for 3rd party service. No app stores, no native apps, no browser specific local or cloud storage of UA auto-logins, and no asking a UA to type in his telephone number. How would this continue to work if a clear HTTP is prohibited by spec globally? Someone demonstrated a business need to capture req headers from a clear MITM proxy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ISPs broadcasting user identifiers in plain text is exactly why universal HTTPS matters.