Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] develop from quilljs:develop #30

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

[pull] develop from quilljs:develop #30

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Nov 22, 2023

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring lodash library usage and improving navigation shortcuts handling
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR switches the usage of individual lodash packages to lodash-es for a smaller bundle size. It also improves the handling of multiple navigation shortcuts in the UINode module and adds a corresponding test.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and mainly involve replacing the lodash library usage and a minor logic change in the UINode module.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The changes in this PR are well-structured and clear. The switch to lodash-es is a good step towards reducing the bundle size. The improvement in the handling of multiple navigation shortcuts in the UINode module is also a good enhancement. The addition of a test for this change is appreciated.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: core/editor.ts
      suggestion: Consider using destructuring to import multiple items from a module in a single line. This can make the code cleaner and easier to read. [medium]
      relevant line: import { cloneDeep, isEqual, merge } from 'lodash-es';

    • relevant file: modules/uiNode.ts
      suggestion: It would be better to use a constant for the magic number 100 in the TTL_FOR_VALID_SELECTION_CHANGE. This would make the code more readable and maintainable. [important]
      relevant line: export const TTL_FOR_VALID_SELECTION_CHANGE = 100;

    • relevant file: test/unit/modules/uiNode.spec.ts
      suggestion: Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases. This can help ensure the robustness of the code. [medium]
      relevant line: describe('uiNode', () => {

How to use

Instructions

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
see the tools guide for more details.

To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

@pull pull bot added ⤵️ pull and removed Refactoring labels Nov 22, 2023
@pull pull bot merged commit be0306e into visualbis:develop Nov 22, 2023
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants