-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented contract instantiation and invocation for integration tests #1988
Open
Helios-vmg
wants to merge
43
commits into
use-ink:master
Choose a base branch
from
CoinFabrik:integration-tests-api-implementation
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Implemented contract instantiation and invocation for integration tests #1988
Helios-vmg
wants to merge
43
commits into
use-ink:master
from
CoinFabrik:integration-tests-api-implementation
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Conflicts: # crates/env/src/lib.rs # crates/env/src/reflect/event.rs # crates/ink/codegen/Cargo.toml
Moved reflection, contract, arithmetic, and miscellaneous types from ink_env to ink_primitives.
This reverts commit 2d1950a.
…tation # Conflicts: # crates/engine/src/database.rs
Helios-vmg
requested review from
cmichi,
ascjones and
SkymanOne
as code owners
November 13, 2023 14:40
This was referenced Nov 13, 2023
10 tasks
@Helios-vmg Could you merge |
…ation # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # crates/engine/src/database.rs # crates/env/Cargo.toml # crates/env/src/call/call_builder.rs # crates/env/src/call/create_builder.rs # crates/env/src/engine/off_chain/impls.rs # crates/env/src/engine/off_chain/mod.rs # crates/env/src/engine/on_chain/impls/pallet_contracts.rs # crates/env/src/lib.rs # crates/ink/codegen/Cargo.toml # crates/ink/macro/Cargo.toml # crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
@cmichi Done. Some notes:
Likewise, running |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
cargo-contract
orpallet-contracts
?This PR implements instantiate_contract(), invoke_contract(), invoke_contract_delegate() and a few other functions for the integration testing environment. More specifically, it permits calling these functions from inside contracts transparently, as if the contract was running on the blockchain.
Description
()
, instead of!
. A further modification was needed on execute_dispatchable() to avoid a compiler error when return_value() doesn't return!
. When test_instantiate is enabled, AnOk(())
is added at the end of the functions (for constructor as well as for message dispatch), thus allowing the test-case to proceed.CHANGELOG.md
Other notes
To test a contract that uses instantiate_contract() in the off-chain environment, use
cargo test --features test_instantiate
.Regarding the build errors in the doc tests, I've been trying to resolve them, but it's difficult without any way to see the macro expansion. When I move the code inside the comments to an actual contract it compiles correctly. Is there any way to move forward with this? Can I mark the comments as no_compile and add equivalent integration tests to catch breaking changes?