Add ConvTranspose1d ONNX op

[tiruka]

Pull Request Template

Checklist

• Confirmed that run-checks all script has been executed.
• Made sure the book is up to date with changes in this PR.

Related Issues/PRs

#1714

Changes

Add ConvTranspose1d ONNX op in accordance with other conv transposed d onnx.

Testing

run-checks all has passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.74468% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.22%. Comparing base (ebe2421) to head (90e75c6).
Report is 28 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/burn-import/src/onnx/op_configuration.rs	88.23%	10 Missing ⚠️
crates/burn-import/src/onnx/to_burn.rs	92.85%	1 Missing ⚠️
crates/onnx-ir/src/dim_inference.rs	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2349      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.38%   85.22%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         770      786      +16     
  Lines       98899   104088    +5189     
==========================================
+ Hits        84441    88706    +4265     
- Misses      14458    15382     +924     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[laggui]

Thanks for adding the op!

Implementation looks good, just a minor comment regarding padding.

Thanks to your comment it actually made me realize that the other conv transpose ops don't check the padding correctly 😅

[laggui]

Awesome! Thanks for fixing the other conv transpose padding discrepancies 🎉

[tiruka]

@laggui
Thank you for your merging it. I am happy I could make contributions. 😀
BTW, I am about to push the following codes with tests to make some refactorings. 😅
What's in my mind is to make a common check function for negativeness, and symmetry about pads.
Do you feel if it is good? If so, I will make another PR. I'd like to hear your opinion.

fn check_symmetric_pads(pads: &Vec<i64>) {
    // Check the length of pads
    if pads.len() % 2 != 0 {
        panic!("Invalid length: pads must have an even number of elements");
    }

    let half_len = pads.len() / 2;

    // Check for negative values
    if pads.iter().any(|&pad| pad < 0) {
        panic!("Negative pad values are not supported");
    }

    // Check for asymmetric padding
    for i in 0..half_len {
        if pads[i] != pads[half_len + i] {
            panic!("Asymmetric padding is not supported");
        }
    }
}

Involved functions will be padding_config_1d, padding_config_2d, padding_config_3d, and conv_transpose1d_config, conv_transpose2d_config, conv_transpose3d_config.

Thank you in advance.

[laggui]

I actually was thinking about that while reading your changes, but I don't think it is worth it right now.

The number of lines reduced just to have one function do the check isn't much, and the current checks make it more explicit for each op.

[tiruka]

Ok, fine.