Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify documentation to match tidy formatting #223

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Modify documentation to match tidy formatting #223

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Joscelinrocha
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed some typos and formatting issues throughout the vignettes and articles. Backticks for package names were removed, addressing issue #218

Unsure of the following uses of the backticks:

  • referring to objects and attributes
  • referring to variable names

Fixed some typos and formatting issues throughout the vignettes and articles. Backticks for package names were removed, addressing issue #218

Unsure of the following uses of the backticks:
- referring to objects and attributes
- referring to variable names
@simonpcouch simonpcouch self-assigned this Aug 15, 2024
@simonpcouch simonpcouch linked an issue Aug 15, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@simonpcouch simonpcouch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spent some time in-person talking through the addition/deletion of EOL whitespaces. Joscelin might revisit and revert those changes or start with a fresh PR!

Thanks so much for working on this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

audit for backticked package names
2 participants