-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enable keeping matched expressions. #1308
Open
jrsperry
wants to merge
7
commits into
stanfordnlp:dev
Choose a base branch
from
jrsperry:enable_keeping_nested_and_overlapped_matches
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1e216de
Add c'mon and 1782117821 to known
manning 691f80f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/dev' into dev
manning 8f50ec7
Add test
manning 6aef9c5
Turn off the 'Testing on Treebank' logging if every other logging lin…
AngledLuffa 3d6587d
Fix PTB tokenizer unit test to match new tokenization of c'mon
AngledLuffa 7491830
enable keeping matched expressions.
636bb23
weird formatting fixes
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -407,7 +407,8 @@ by | |
% | ||
. | ||
<p> | ||
C'mon | ||
C'm | ||
on | ||
Fred | ||
, | ||
you | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ public String getText() { | |
return text; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public String getName() { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. how is this related? |
||
return this.extractFunc.name; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public CoreMap getAnnotation() { | ||
return annotation; | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The truth is, I know almost nothing about tokensregex, and I would say the people still at Stanford are generally in the same boat. Why is it necessary to use
Objects.equals
here? I see that it was done for a differentBoolean
earlier as wellThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also, should the default be false instead? that way the behavior doesn't change for existing use cases