-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Brier score testing #18
Conversation
…g rule for competing risk models
e0faf83
to
299d9e6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
everything is ok
@@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ class GradientBoostingIncidence(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin): | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- In practise both objective yields -> In practice both objectives yield
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had not seen this suggestion. Could you please open a follow-up PR to fix this now that this Pr is merged?
…testing Improve Brier score testing dafe99d
This a PR to check that our IPCW Brier score implementation behaves empirically as a proper scoring rule on a marginal model (no covariates).
This is similar to what we have in our example but only do marginal model estimation via the
brier_score_*
function on a grid of estimates.This way we do not depend on any bias induced by underfitting caused by a bad tuning of the hyperparameters of a conditional model such as
GradientBoostingIncidence
.