Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade alpine from 3.17 to 3.18.3 #1696

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Todai88
Copy link

@Todai88 Todai88 commented Nov 10, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to alpine:3.18.3, as this image has only 1 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
low severity 686 CVE-2023-5363
SNYK-ALPINE317-OPENSSL-6032385
No Known Exploit
low severity 686 CVE-2023-5363
SNYK-ALPINE317-OPENSSL-6032385
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@Todai88 Todai88 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2023 14:32
@Todai88 Todai88 requested review from robh-snyk and removed request for a team November 10, 2023 14:32
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants