Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merging incremental-checkpoint-feature branch to master #821

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
May 31, 2018

Conversation

dilini-muthumala
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Adding incremental checkpointing API to Siddhi

Goals

Introducing incremental checkpointing functionality to state persistence. Please refer #820

Release note

Introducing incremental checkpointing functionality to state persistence

Related PRs

#695

miyurud and others added 30 commits December 8, 2017 15:03
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016, WSO2 Inc. (http://www.wso2.org) All Rights Reserved.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix Licence year

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 889e5cb


SiddhiManager siddhiManager = new SiddhiManager();

// PersistenceStore persistenceStore = new org.wso2.siddhi.core.util.persistence.FileSystemPersistenceStore();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove commented out code

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 889e5cb

* The class which encloses multiple snapshot states.
*/
public class SnapshotStateList implements Serializable {
private TreeMap<Long, SnapshotState> snapshotStates = new TreeMap<>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we need a serialVersionUUID?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it's not needed here as the find bugs plugin did not complain on this.

@dilini-muthumala dilini-muthumala removed the request for review from suhothayan May 31, 2018 22:10
@tishan89 tishan89 merged commit 0771568 into siddhi-io:master May 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants