Rollup of 8 pull requests #133814
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #133814
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Approved in [ACP 491](rust-lang/libs-team#491). Remove the `unsafe` on `core::intrinsics::breakpoint()`, since it's a safe intrinsic to call and has no prerequisites. (Thanks to @zachs18 for figuring out the `bootstrap`/`not(bootstrap)` logic.)
a release operation synchronizes with an acquire operation Change: 1. `Calls to park _synchronize-with_ calls to unpark` to `Calls to unpark _synchronize-with_ calls to park` 2. `park synchronizes-with _all_ prior unpark operations` to `_all_ prior unpark operations synchronize-with park`
improve TagEncoding::Niche docs, sanity check, and UB checks Turns out the `niche_variants` range can actually contain the `untagged_variant`. We should report this as UB in Miri, so this PR implements that. Also rename `partially_check_layout` to `layout_sanity_check` for better consistency with how similar functions are called in other parts of the compiler. Turns out my adjustments to the transmutation logic also fix rust-lang#126267.
Add `core::arch::breakpoint` and test Approved in [ACP 491](rust-lang/libs-team#491).
…-ozkan Include LLDB and GDB visualizers in MSVC distribution MSVC distributions currently don't include the lldb or GDB python files. MSVC and LLDB/GDB are not mutually exclusive (and end up being a common case with vscode + codelldb/lldb-dap), so they should probably be included. the existing visualizers currently only partially work on MSVC due to the differences in how the debug info is generated, but they also only partially work on GNU anyway - both of which are actively being fixed.
Remove `generic_associated_types_extended` feature gate This PR retires nightly support for the `generic_associated_types_extended` feature. This feature hasn't received much attention in the last two years or so, and I believe the feature still remains both unsound and ICEy to use. I think that if we were to redesign and reimplement it, we'd want to first figure out how to implement it soundly, but in the mean time I'd prefer to clean this up. r? `@lcnr` cc `@jackh726` who added this feature gate I think
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
sysroot_target_{bin,lib}dirhandling #132723 (Unifysysroot_target_{bin,lib}dirhandling)--print=deployment-target#133041 (Print name of env var in--print=deployment-target)core::arch::breakpointand test #133726 (Addcore::arch::breakpointand test)generic_associated_types_extendedfeature gate #133768 (Removegeneric_associated_types_extendedfeature gate)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup