Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix encoding error on winbuilder
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
malcolmbarrett committed Mar 26, 2018
1 parent 0a4848c commit 7efd02b
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 7 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .Rbuildignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
^_pkgdown\.yml$
^docs$
^cran-comments\.md$
^CRAN-RELEASE
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/articles/bias-structures.html

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/articles/intro-to-dags.html

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/articles/intro-to-ggdag.html

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions inst/WORDLIST
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ graphviz
grey
halfcircle
Hernán
Hernán
Hernán's
Hernán's
hjust
knitr
lineheight
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion vignettes/bias-structures.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -249,5 +249,5 @@ But follow-up is downstream from a collider, symptoms. Controlling for a downstr

Many, if not all, forms of systematic bias can be drawn as DAGs. Here are a few sources with interesting examples:

* Miguel Hernán's course on DAGs includes a number of examples on common structures of bias: [Causal Diagrams: Draw Your Assumptions Before Your Conclusions](https://www.edx.org/course/causal-diagrams-draw-assumptions-harvardx-ph559x). Also see his article [A structural approach to selection bias](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15308962).
* Miguel Hernán's course on DAGs includes a number of examples on common structures of bias: [Causal Diagrams: Draw Your Assumptions Before Your Conclusions](https://www.edx.org/course/causal-diagrams-draw-assumptions-harvardx-ph559x). Also see his article [A structural approach to selection bias](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15308962).
* The chapter on DAGs in [Modern Epidemiology](https://books.google.com/books/about/Modern_Epidemiology.html?id=Z3vjT9ALxHUC) includes a couple of the examples here and many more directly related to conducting observational research, including measurement error, selection bias, residual confounding, and missing data.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion vignettes/intro-to-dags.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Now smoking and cardiac arrest are d-separated. Since our question is about the

# Resources

* Miguel Hernán, who has written extensively on the subject of causal inference and DAGs, has an accessible course on edx that teaches the use of DAGs for causal inference: [Causal Diagrams: Draw Your Assumptions Before Your Conclusions](https://www.edx.org/course/causal-diagrams-draw-assumptions-harvardx-ph559x). Also see his article [The Hazard of Hazard Ratios](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653612/) for more on issues with hazard ratios in causal inference.
* Miguel Hernán, who has written extensively on the subject of causal inference and DAGs, has an accessible course on edx that teaches the use of DAGs for causal inference: [Causal Diagrams: Draw Your Assumptions Before Your Conclusions](https://www.edx.org/course/causal-diagrams-draw-assumptions-harvardx-ph559x). Also see his article [The Hazard of Hazard Ratios](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653612/) for more on issues with hazard ratios in causal inference.
* Julia Rohrer has a very readable paper introducing DAGs, mostly from the perspective of psychology: [Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data](http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2515245917745629)
* Judea Pearl also has a number of texts on the subject of varying technical difficulty. A good place to start is [Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer](http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/PRIMER/). See also his article with Sander Greenland and James Robins on collapsibility: [Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2676645?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents).
* If you're an epidemiologist, I also recommend the chapter on DAGs in [Modern Epidemiology](https://books.google.com/books/about/Modern_Epidemiology.html?id=Z3vjT9ALxHUC).

0 comments on commit 7efd02b

Please sign in to comment.