Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add memory planning tests to Cadence #7431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

skrtskrtfb
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Adding memory planning tests to Cadence backend

Reviewed By: zonglinpeng

Differential Revision: D67183235

Summary: Adding memory planning tests to Cadence backend

Reviewed By: zonglinpeng

Differential Revision: D67183235
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Dec 23, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7431

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 1166bfc with merge base f370e78 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Dec 23, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D67183235

@skrtskrtfb skrtskrtfb added the release notes: backends Changes to any of the backend delegates label Dec 27, 2024
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit 40e956f into pytorch:main Dec 27, 2024
44 of 48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported release notes: backends Changes to any of the backend delegates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants