Fix archiverFileSystem #207
Open
+7
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
RAR extraction still needs to be fixed. |
|
You are right. I was wondering why it was using |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After 024fe54, the archive filesystem broke. The implementation needed to be a tiny bit different, and at least one bug broke it completely (mholt/archives#9).
This PR updates the package to the newest version (the bug fix) and then returns
ArchiveFSas a pointer, as onArchiveFS, only the pointer method forReadDirexists. This fixes walking the archive.Also, I changed the type it searches for to
archives.Extractioninstead ofarchives.Archivalto support extracting.rararchives.