Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*.specific: also probe for expanded #675

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

priv-kweihmann
Copy link
Owner

items, as variables could be used in the expression too

Pull request checklist

Bugfix

  • A testcase was added to test the behavior

@priv-kweihmann priv-kweihmann force-pushed the fix/spec-expanded branch 3 times, most recently from 93f3a5a to 6240a02 Compare December 22, 2024 09:31
items, as variables could be used in the expression too

Signed-off-by: Konrad Weihmann <[email protected]>
as it looks like coverage is buggy esp. on py 3.9

Signed-off-by: Konrad Weihmann <[email protected]>
@priv-kweihmann priv-kweihmann merged commit 177a5e8 into master Dec 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@priv-kweihmann priv-kweihmann deleted the fix/spec-expanded branch December 22, 2024 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant