-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 750
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Adapter: Relevant Digital #3216
New Adapter: Relevant Digital #3216
Conversation
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
58adafe
to
ba3630e
Compare
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
ba3630e
to
7f1ed2a
Compare
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
@hugolm84,
|
7f1ed2a
to
429745b
Compare
Thanks! Fixed. |
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
@hugolm84 Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
429745b
to
aa81755
Compare
Fixed :) |
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
aa81755
to
82302e8
Compare
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are lots of test cases missing. For example - should add test cases for video and native as well and few supplemental test cases. Refer to other adapter codes for reference.
82302e8
to
fc29c07
Compare
d826904
to
ed8005b
Compare
Code coverage summaryNote:
relevantdigitalRefer here for heat map coverage report
|
Thanks, this seems to be fixed now :) |
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | |||
endpoint: "https://{{.Host}}.relevant-digital.com/openrtb2/auction" | |||
maintainer: | |||
email: "[email protected]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have sent an email to the above address again. Please reply with received.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have replied.
Host looks like an optional param to me. Removing myself from the reviewer list. |
Hm, I might be missing something but doesnt the bidder-params specify what is required or not? Edit: Oh, I see now, the Host is the name of the param but its acquired like so:
and bidder-params defines:
|
@onkarvhanumante - please ensure that host is optional. Thanks! |
@hugolm84 ptal at #3216 (comment) comment |
@hugolm84 - I'm only involved in this because of the semi-dynamic host thing. That's resolved. Am removing myself from the reviewers list. |
co-authored by: @hugolm84
Greetings Prebid team, I have the pleasure of submitting this adapter on
relevantdigital
s behalf.This adapter is consistent with the .js adapter so please see previous documentation for
relevantdigital
js adapter here: https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/bidders/relevantdigital.htmlThis PR is also dependant on the following PRs:
s2s support for .js adapter: prebid/Prebid.js#10610
s2s documentation: prebid/prebid.github.io#4931