-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable libstdc++ #144
Closed
Closed
Enable libstdc++ #144
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a0319ba
Switched crosstool-ng to xtensa-1.22.x branch
Sermus fa85e2a
GCC patches retargetted from 4.8.2 to 4.8.5 to make them compatible w…
Sermus f930fb2
Build procedure for libnlport.a. esp_newlib_port switched to lx106 br…
Sermus bbb55ab
libnlport is compiled after the combined toolchain is ready
Sermus a26206b
esptool was switched to original themadinventor repo
Sermus 11ae0d0
Added romized versions of ld scripts
Sermus 64dfb5e
Romized linked script patch added. Submodule esp_stdcpp_port added. S…
Sermus cdf2aa3
Added building libstdc++port lib into Makefile
Sermus 87a96e4
esp_stdcpp_port submodule switched to lx106 branch
Sermus 3f0057b
Esptool retargetted to the original repo
Sermus 7a1b990
Completeing retargetting submodules
Sermus 7773422
Completeing retargetting submodules
Sermus File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't plan to switch to upstream repo. See espressif/esptool#89 (comment) why.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, i see the reason. Does this mean that your esptool fork stays where it is not pulling changes from the origin? What about quite useful ones like cooking OTA images?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course no, I pull changes in (from time to time, especially after prodding), maintain my own changes on top from time to time, and hope to never need to revert anything (but still reserve a room for). I just pulled bunch of changes, would like to test them first before pulling the rest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. Looking forward to other comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "--version=2" changes are needed. Without them there is no way to create a >512KB image (like the one sgi tests produce). Of course we could create a linker script which would create canonical 0x00000/0x40000 image of 1MB+ size but using OTA images and 1/2/4MB linker scripts already provided by Espressif seems to be a better solution, doesn't it?