test(features): add bdd for existing ci-tests

[sinhaashish]

Pull Request template

Please, go through these steps before you submit a PR.

Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:

What this PR does?:

Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Any additional information for your reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

• Fixes #
• PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
• Has the change log section been updated?
• Commit has unit tests
• Commit has integration tests
• (Optional) Are upgrade changes included in this PR? If not, mention the issue/PR to track:
• (Optional) If documentation changes are required, which issue on https://github.com/openebs/website is used to track them:

PLEASE REMOVE BELOW INFORMATION BEFORE SUBMITTING

The PR title message must follow convention:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>.

Where:

• type is defining if release will be triggering after merging submitted changes, details in CONTRIBUTING.md.
  Most common types are:

  • feat - for new features, not a new feature for build script
  • fix - for bug fixes or improvements, not a fix for build script
  • chore - changes not related to production code
  • docs - changes related to documentation
  • style - formatting, missing semi colons, linting fix etc; no significant production code changes
  • test - adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change
  • refactor - refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable or function name, there should not be any significant production code changes

• scope is a single word that best describes where the changes fit.
  Most common scopes are like:

  • data engine (localpv, jiva, cstor)
  • feature (provisioning, backup, restore, exporter)
  • code component (api, webhook, cast, upgrade)
  • test (tests, bdd)
  • chores (version, build, log, travis)

• subject is a single line brief description of the changes made in the pull request.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.53%. Comparing base (bd0eb10) to head (53e7e76).
Report is 11 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #551   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.53%   99.53%           
========================================
  Files            1        1           
  Lines          431      431           
========================================
  Hits           429      429           
  Misses           1        1           
  Partials         1        1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
bddtests	99.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Abhinandan-Purkait]

I think we need to combine the scenarios that have same set of actions but just different set of properties are used, they should be a scenario outline.

[w3aman]

LGTM