Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add codemeta.json #30

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add codemeta.json #30

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ehennestad
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehennestad ehennestad commented Oct 30, 2024

Issue #23

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Test Results

464 tests   464 ✅  1m 11s ⏱️
  6 suites    0 💤
  1 files      0 ❌

Results for commit b432b14.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ehennestad ehennestad changed the title Add codemeta.json (Issue#23) Add codemeta.json (Issue #23) Oct 30, 2024
@ehennestad ehennestad changed the title Add codemeta.json (Issue #23) Add codemeta.json Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.07%. Comparing base (f523d97) to head (b432b14).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #30   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.07%   37.07%           
=======================================
  Files         323      323           
  Lines        3118     3118           
=======================================
  Hits         1156     1156           
  Misses       1962     1962           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ehennestad ehennestad requested a review from lzehl October 30, 2024 20:57
Copy link
Member

@lzehl lzehl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey. I had a look (see my smaller comments) but I would suggest to pull in @apdavison as reviewer.

"description": "openMINDS MATLAB is a toolbox to support the creation and use of openMINDS metadata models and schemas in MATLAB, with import and export in JSON-LD format. The package contains all openMINDS schemas as MATLAB classes in addition to schema base classes and utility methods.",
"applicationCategory": "neuroscience",
"releaseNotes": "https://github.com/openMetadataInitiative/openMINDS_MATLAB/releases",
"funding": "https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/945539",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume that this is not enough (depending on the version). Right now you would receive funding through EBRAINS 2.0 I guess?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this not be an array? with funder inside? not sure how codemeta handles this...

"version": "0.9.3",
"downloadUrl": "https://github.com/openMetadataInitiative/openMINDS_MATLAB/releases/download/v0.9.3/openMINDS_MATLAB_v0_9_3.mltbx",
"dateModified": "2024-10-01"
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should have an empty line at the end

function mustBeValidVersionString(versionString)
pattern = 'v\d+\.\d+\.\d+';
assert( ~ismissing( regexp(versionString, pattern, 'match', 'once')), 'Invalid version string. Must be formatted as v<major>.<minor>.<patch>' )
end
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should have an empty line at the end

"softwareRequirements": [
"MATLAB R2022b or later"
],
"relatedLink": [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instead or in addition you could define isPartOf since this repo is part of the open metadata initiative organisation on github

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants