Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Tests 6.1.39-6.1.42 to 6.1.38-6.1.41 #846

Conversation

tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor

- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#705, oasis-tcs#839
- rename test 6.1.39 to 6.1.38 to reflect structural change
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#705, oasis-tcs#839
- rename test 6.1.40 to 6.1.39 to reflect structural change
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#705, oasis-tcs#839
- rename test 6.1.41 to 6.1.40 to reflect structural change
- addresses parts of oasis-tcs#705, oasis-tcs#839
- rename test 6.1.42 to 6.1.41 to reflect structural change
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 added editorial mostly nits and consistency editor-revision already worked on in the editor revision csaf 2.1 csaf 2.1 work labels Dec 16, 2024
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 requested a review from sthagen December 16, 2024 16:47
@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sthagen sthagen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - this aligns with the no-gap move in the sections of the prose, right?

@tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM - this aligns with the no-gap move in the sections of the prose, right?

Yes. If you didn't change the order - I did just shift all tests one number down.

@tschmidtb51
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just double-checked: Same names - seems good...

@tschmidtb51 tschmidtb51 merged commit 0c478eb into oasis-tcs:editor-revision-2024-11-27 Dec 17, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
csaf 2.1 csaf 2.1 work editor-revision already worked on in the editor revision editorial mostly nits and consistency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants