Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1131: clarify comment about ms conditional #1132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions HEN_HOUSE/src/egsnrc.mortran
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1246,8 +1246,10 @@ $start_new_particle;
is_ch_step = .false.;
IF((tustep <= tperp) & ((~exact_bca) | (tustep > skindepth)))
[
"We are further way from a boundary than a skindepth, so
"perform a normal condensed-history step
"We are further away from a boundary than a skindepth and
"either: we are not using exact boundary-crossing, or the
"requested condensed-history step is greater than the
"skindepth. So perform a normal condensed-history step
callhowfar = .false.; "Do not call HAWFAR
domultiple = .false.; "Multiple scattering done here
dosingle = .false.; "MS => no single scattering
Expand Down