Add accepted manuscript and ref report #2

README.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The following figure (adapted from [Gajjar et al. 2018](https://ui.adsabs.harvar
 
 ![measurement diagram](figures/measurements_fig.png)
 
-If the bursts are unresolved, then the drift rate measurement becomes a slope measurement. All attempts should be made to distinguish these two measurements. However, many unresolved bursts remain. Unresolved pulse trains can appear as sub-bursts that are longer in duration and shallower in slope, which is consistent with the prediction of [Rajabi et al. 2020](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02395) for the sub-burst slope. Indeed if the model accurately describes emission from repeating FRBs, then the behaviour of both of these measurements are due to the dynamical motions of the emitting material, and the slopes of sub-bursts as well as the drift rate of sub-bursts in pulse trains can follow the same law (see eqs. 6-8 of [Rajabi et al. 2020](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02395)).
+If the bursts are unresolved, then the drift rate measurement becomes a slope measurement. All attempts should be made to distinguish these two measurements. However, many unresolved bursts remain. Unresolved pulse trains can appear as sub-bursts that are longer in duration and shallower in slope, which is consistent with the prediction of [Rajabi et al. 2020](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02395) for the sub-burst slope. Indeed if the model accurately describes emission from repeating FRBs, then the behaviour of both of these measurements are due to the dynamical motions of the emitting material, and the slopes of sub-bursts as well as the drift rate of sub-bursts in pulse trains can follow the same law (see eqs. 6-8 of [Rajabi et al. 2020](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02395)). For more details on this issue see Section 3.1 of [the paper](writeups/drafts/Sub_drift_law_MNRAS_accepted_jul13_2021.pdf).
 
 # Key files