Update example to clarify the sum of flex-grow factors #37359
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Try to clarify and solidify example and summations... Specifically, differentiate between the number of grow-factors vs. the sum of the grow-factors. Please review.
github-actions
bot
added
Content:CSS
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Modified the examples to clarify summations and flex-grow factors... Specifically, differentiate between the number of grow-factors vs. the sum of the grow-factors.
Motivation
I felt the examples were not exactly correct and required clarification.
Additional details
Technically, I think the growth factor applied to a flex item is equal to the weighted average of all flex-grow factors. Math gurus please check me on this.
Related issues and pull requests