refactor(components): Rename StoreMessage to MessageStore for Better Clarity

[Vigtu]

Changes in Message Store Component:

Component Rename:

1. StoreMessage -> MessageStore:

• Renamed class from StoreMessageComponent to MessageStoreComponent
• Updated display name to "Message Store"
• Changed icon from "save" to "message-square-text"
• Updated component name to "MessageStore"

Output Configuration:

• Added hidden=True to stored_messages output

Import Updates:

• Updated import in init.py:
  • store_message -> message_store
  • StoreMessageComponent -> MessageStoreComponent

File Rename:

• store_message.py -> message_store.py

No Functional Changes:

• Core functionality remains the same
• Only naming and cosmetic changes applied
• Component description maintained

[erichare]

@Vigtu same for this one, if you don't mind fixing the merge conflict i'll do a review!

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5009 will degrade performances by 23.25%

_{Comparing Vigtu:store-message-component (1489ea0) with main (b692ef7)}

Summary

⚡ 3 improvements
❌ 1 regressions
✅ 11 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	Vigtu:store-message-component	Change
⚡	test_get_and_cache_all_types_dict	1,043.8 µs	844.8 µs	+23.56%
⚡	test_successful_run_with_input_type_any	258.1 ms	163.1 ms	+58.18%
❌	test_successful_run_with_output_type_any	177.2 ms	230.9 ms	-23.25%
⚡	test_successful_run_with_output_type_debug	249.9 ms	160.4 ms	+55.85%

[ogabrielluiz]

Hey @Vigtu

Thanks for the PR!

When changing componentes we shouldn't change the file name AND the name. You must keep one as it is for backwards compatibility.

You should be better off reverting the change to the name attribute.

Also, if you could add tests to this component like you can see in src/backend/tests/unit/components/../test_input_components.py it would be really good.

Thanks!

[ogabrielluiz]

This breaks backwards compatibility

[erichare]

@ogabrielluiz are there any consequences you can see from this PR as it stands now? I want to defer to you on this one. I think the change makes sense, but wondering if there's anything i'm missing beyond what you pointed out already.

[ogabrielluiz]

LGTM