Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSPP: Implementation of Domain-Specific Large Model Benchmarking Based on KubeEdge-Ianvs #144

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is the implementation of #95

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 9, 2024
@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 9, 2024
@MooreZheng MooreZheng requested a review from hsj576 September 10, 2024 08:12
Copy link
Member

@hsj576 hsj576 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The "print" in the code should be replaced by "LOGGER.info" (from core.common.log import LOGGER ").

@IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor Author

The "print" in the code should be replaced by "LOGGER.info" (from core.common.log import LOGGER ").

@hsj576 Thank you for your advice! Now they are all replaced.

Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebases are needed.

  1. There is a file with conflicts like docs/proposals/scenarios/llm-benchmarks/llm-benchmarks.md that needs to take care of. e.g., using rebase https://liwt31.github.io/2019/12/25/merge_rebase/.

  2. all commits need sign-off, which can also be solved by using rebase

Commit sha: 9b7f9c5, Author: IcyFeather, Committer: IcyFeather; The sign-off is missing.
Commit sha: ce9f470, Author: IcyFeather, Committer: IcyFeather; The sign-off is missing.

To add your Signed-off-by line to every commit in this branch:

Ensure you have a local copy of your branch by checking out the pull request locally via command line.
In your local branch, run: git rebase HEAD~11 --signoff
Force push your changes to overwrite the branch: git push --force-with-lease origin dev

Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebases are needed.

  1. There is a file with conflicts like docs/proposals/scenarios/llm-benchmarks/llm-benchmarks.md that needs to take care of. e.g., using rebase https://liwt31.github.io/2019/12/25/merge_rebase/.
  2. all commits need sign-off, which can also be solved by using rebase

Commit sha: 9b7f9c5, Author: IcyFeather, Committer: IcyFeather; The sign-off is missing.
Commit sha: ce9f470, Author: IcyFeather, Committer: IcyFeather; The sign-off is missing.

To add your Signed-off-by line to every commit in this branch:
Ensure you have a local copy of your branch by checking out the pull request locally via command line.
In your local branch, run: git rebase HEAD~11 --signoff
Force push your changes to overwrite the branch: git push --force-with-lease origin dev

Reminder: There are three CI issues that remain to be resolved, mainly for Pylint, see https://github.com/kubeedge/ianvs/actions/runs/11268242806

@IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MooreZheng The similar pylint issues are described in #152

To solve this, sedna and ianvs need to corporate. We discussed this problem in the last week zoom meeting, and it seems that it should be discussed more to find a final solution.

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2024
@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsj576 might also want to review this project

Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine, but we need to refine the Chinese words as in English.

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 24, 2024
@MooreZheng MooreZheng added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Oct 26, 2024
@IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MooreZheng I have changed Chinese words to English

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

Overall it looks fine. Any comment from @hsj576 before merging?

Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good. There is only one Chinese statement right now and we are very close to the final version.

Currently, this pull request contains 25 commits, which can make maintenance difficult, considering the number of contributors, pull requests, and their commits in KubeEdge Ianvs. In the final stage, @IcyFeather233 can squash the commits into one using rebase techniques.


def extract_comprehensive_score(input_str):
# extract overall points
match = re.search(r"'综合得分': (\d+)", input_str)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the re.search of llm_judgement.py, we need to replace Chinese characters with English.

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

add opencompass and llm singletask learning bench

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm single task learning bench readme

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

add government benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm government benchmark implementation

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm government benchmark implementation

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government README

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark format

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government benchmark dataset

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

add llm-benchmarks proposal

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark proposal

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark proposal

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark proposal

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

translate llm-benchmark proposal

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update proposal, add opencompass tutorial

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government benchmark sedna package

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark format

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update llm benchmark format

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

fix pylint check problem

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

fix pylint check problem

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

fix pylint check problem

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

trans Chinese comments to English

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

add government llm benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>

update government llm benchmark

Signed-off-by: IcyFeather <[email protected]>
@IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MooreZheng All commits merged into one, and all Chinese words changed to English

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This branch has conflicts that must be resolved
Use the web editor or the to resolve conflicts.
Conflicting files
core/testenvmanager/dataset/dataset.py

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 29, 2024
@IcyFeather233
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MooreZheng conflicts are resolved

Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conflicts still exists

This branch has conflicts that must be resolved
Use the web editor or the to resolve conflicts.
Conflicting files
core/testenvmanager/dataset/dataset.py

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

MooreZheng commented Oct 30, 2024

Now conflicts have been solved after merging #162

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 30, 2024
@hsj576
Copy link
Member

hsj576 commented Oct 30, 2024

/lgtm

@MooreZheng
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 30, 2024
@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot merged commit 432d321 into kubeedge:main Oct 30, 2024
13 checks passed
Copy link
Collaborator

@MooreZheng MooreZheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All concerns are fixed. Well done!

@kubeedge-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MooreZheng

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@IcyFeather233 IcyFeather233 deleted the dev branch October 30, 2024 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants