mod: [doc] performance -> inefficiency #284
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
What? "Inefficiency" means basically the opposite of "performance", did you mean "efficiency"? What about "performance" can be understood incorrectly? |
|
Inefficiency is probably not the best word, but I agree with it possibly being confusing. 2x performance from the charts could be read as "2 times more performant". |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi. I'm big fan of Koka and Perceus.
Thank you for creating a great programming language.
I read the document and found something that might be corrected,
So I will send a PR.
There are expressions in the documentation
as if CG languages are a more efficient programming language than C/C++/Rust.
Especially the "our goal is to be within 2x of the performance of C/C++"
part seemed to be understood incorrectly.
As a experiment, I replaced "performance" with "inefficiency".
If there is a better way to fix it, that is fine.
Thank you.