Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] [ruby] Update globalid: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 (patch) #326

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Jan 20, 2023


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

↗️ globalid (indirect, 1.0.0 → 1.0.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in GlobalID

There is a ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in the GlobalID gem. This
vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22799.

Versions Affected: >= 0.2.1
Not affected: < 0.2.1
Fixed Versions: 1.0.1

Impact

There is a possible DoS vulnerability in the model name parsing section
of the GlobalID gem. Carefully crafted input can cause the regular
expression engine to take an unexpected amount of time. All users running
an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds
immediately.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Release Notes

1.0.1

Possible ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in GlobalID

There is a ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in the GlobalID gem. This
vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2023-22799.

Versions Affected: >= 0.2.1
Not affected: NOTAFFECTED
Fixed Versions: 1.0.1

Impact

There is a possible DoS vulnerability in the model name parsing section of the
GlobalID gem. Carefully crafted input can cause the regular expression engine
to take an unexpected amount of time. All users running an affected release
should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Releases

The FIXED releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

There are no feasible workarounds for this issue.

Credits

Thank you ooooooo_k for reporting this!

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 2 commits:

↗️ minitest (indirect, 5.16.3 → 5.17.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

5.17.0 (from changelog)

  • 1 minor enhancement:

    • Refactor setup hooks into a SETUP_METHODS constant. (MSP-Greg)

  • 3 bug fixes:

    • Fix kwargs for Mock calls to delegator. (blowmage)

    • Fix kwargs for expectations. (bobmazanec, blowmage)

    • Remove check for .b method. (tenderlove)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 10 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Jan 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants