Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move k0s version defaulting into a phase #571

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Move k0s version defaulting into a phase #571

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

kke
Copy link
Contributor

@kke kke commented Oct 11, 2023

Fixes #569
Closes #570 (alternate)

Adds a DefaultK0sVersion phase that sets the k0s version when it has been left undefined.

Adds a spec.k0s.versionChannel config key for selecting between "stable" and "latest" channels for version lookups.

@kke kke added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 11, 2023
@kke kke force-pushed the version-getter-phase branch 2 times, most recently from cd5162f to 14cb4a8 Compare October 11, 2023 11:58
@kke kke marked this pull request as draft October 11, 2023 12:34
@kke kke force-pushed the version-getter-phase branch 3 times, most recently from c10248e to df7405a Compare October 12, 2023 11:38
@kke kke marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2023 12:34
@kke kke requested a review from twz123 October 12, 2023 12:34
@kke kke force-pushed the version-getter-phase branch from df7405a to 1fb8338 Compare October 13, 2023 10:57
twz123
twz123 previously approved these changes Oct 13, 2023
@kke kke force-pushed the version-getter-phase branch from b4ea463 to cd5b6ea Compare October 16, 2023 07:28
@kke kke merged commit 07a4412 into main Oct 16, 2023
28 checks passed
@kke kke deleted the version-getter-phase branch October 16, 2023 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unit tests fail in airgapped environments
2 participants