Pass username/password to Cassandra docker-compose health check

[akstron]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Resolves [Bug]: cassandra container never becomes healthy #6215

Description of the changes

• Added the username and password values for health check cmd
• Added healthcheck_cassandra point to make sure the container is healthy as per the cmd.

How was this change tested?

• bash scripts/cassandra-integration-test.sh 4 v004 v1
• bash scripts/cassandra-integration-test.sh 4 v004 v2

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.47%. Comparing base (6585c6e) to head (c747574).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6214   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.47%   96.47%           
=======================================
  Files         354      354           
  Lines       20127    20127           
=======================================
  Hits        19418    19418           
  Misses        524      524           
  Partials      185      185           

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.31% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.67% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1	14.39% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.61% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1	14.39% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2	1.61% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1	18.59% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	18.67% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	18.85% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	1.66% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
grpc_v1	9.47% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2	7.00% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1	8.88% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2	1.67% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2	1.67% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.73% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.72% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v2	1.67% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
tailsampling-processor	0.46% <ø> (ø)
unittests	95.38% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yurishkuro]

I don't mind this change, but I would like to understand what specifically it's fixing since our CI was fine without it. And if it fixes a real problem then why didn't our CI catch it before.

[akstron]

I don't mind this change, but I would like to understand what specifically it's fixing since our CI was fine without it. And if it fixes a real problem then why didn't our CI catch it before.

Replied in the issue linked. Thanks

[yurishkuro]

Thanks