Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubescore plugin unit-testing #362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024
Merged

kubescore plugin unit-testing #362

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

Nithunikzz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented May 8, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 2 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 0 findings
AppSec Analyzer 0 findings
Secrets Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖.
Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues
but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

This pull request includes several changes across different files in the github.com/intelops/kubviz project. The key changes include updates to the project's dependencies, additions of mocking libraries for testing, and updates to the trivy_image.go file responsible for running Trivy image scans and publishing the results.

From an application security perspective, the changes generally appear to be focused on improving the testing and development infrastructure of the project, which can have a positive impact on the overall security of the application. The addition of mocking libraries and the updates to the trivy_image.go file suggest a focus on improving the testability and reliability of the container image scanning process, which is a crucial aspect of application security.

However, it's important to note that the ExecuteCommand function in the kubescore_test.go file could potentially be a source of security vulnerabilities if not properly sanitized or validated. Additionally, the mock implementation in the trivy_client_mock.go file does not appear to include input validation, error handling, authorization, or logging and monitoring functionality, which are important security considerations for a real-world application.

Files Changed:

  1. go.mod: The changes update the project's dependencies, adding new mocking libraries and updating the version of an existing dependency. This is generally a positive change, as it helps ensure the project is using the latest versions of libraries, which may include security fixes.

  2. agent/kubviz/plugins/kubescore/kubescore_test.go: The changes introduce new tests for the kubescore package, covering the publishKubescoreMetrics, ExecuteCommand, and publish functions. While the tests appear to be focused on improving the testability of the package, the ExecuteCommand function should be reviewed to ensure that user input is properly sanitized and validated.

  3. go.sum: The changes update the project's dependency versions, which is a good security practice to ensure the project is using the latest versions of libraries.

  4. agent/kubviz/plugins/trivy/trivy_image.go: The changes introduce a new JetStreamContextInterface and improvements to the Trivy image scanning process, including caching, error handling, and Opentelemetry instrumentation. These changes are generally positive from a security perspective, as they help improve the reliability and observability of the image scanning process.

  5. mocks/trivy_client_mock.go: The changes introduce a mock implementation of the JetStreamContextInterface. While this is a useful tool for testing, the mock implementation does not appear to include input validation, error handling, authorization, or logging and monitoring functionality, which are important security considerations for a real-world application.

Powered by DryRun Security

@vijeyashintelops vijeyashintelops merged commit 42a3878 into main May 8, 2024
22 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants