Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: fix wrong cache key on eth_getBlockByHash (#3232) #3233

Merged

Conversation

ebadiere
Copy link
Contributor

@ebadiere ebadiere commented Nov 7, 2024

Description:
Cherry-picked PR that fixes a cache key issue.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #3232

@ebadiere ebadiere requested review from AlfredoG87, lukelee-sl and a team as code owners November 7, 2024 16:26
* chore: fix wrong passed param

Signed-off-by: nikolay <[email protected]>

* chore: modify existing test to handle block_ properties as well

Signed-off-by: nikolay <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: nikolay <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Badiere <[email protected]>
@ebadiere ebadiere force-pushed the 3231-cherry-pick-cache-key-on-eth_getBlockByHash branch from a835100 to b299f27 Compare November 7, 2024 16:27
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Test Results

 21 files  + 1  266 suites  ±0   35m 29s ⏱️ + 2m 31s
604 tests  -  1  598 ✅ + 1  4 💤 ±0  2 ❌  - 2 
646 runs   - 17  638 ✅  - 17  4 💤 ±0  4 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit b299f27. ± Comparison against base commit 74ee9ec.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@ebadiere ebadiere added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 7, 2024
@ebadiere ebadiere self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@ebadiere ebadiere added this to the 0.59.0 milestone Nov 7, 2024
@ebadiere ebadiere merged commit 11ab77a into release/0.59 Nov 7, 2024
44 of 46 checks passed
@ebadiere ebadiere deleted the 3231-cherry-pick-cache-key-on-eth_getBlockByHash branch November 7, 2024 18:37
@quiet-node quiet-node added process Build, test and deployment-process related tasks and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.84%. Comparing base (74ee9ec) to head (b299f27).
Report is 5 commits behind head on release/0.59.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release/0.59    #3233      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         83.12%   82.84%   -0.28%     
================================================
  Files                66       69       +3     
  Lines              4314     4477     +163     
  Branches            843      883      +40     
================================================
+ Hits               3586     3709     +123     
- Misses              485      518      +33     
- Partials            243      250       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
config-service 98.14% <ø> (ø)
relay 85.23% <100.00%> (ø)
server 83.52% <ø> (ø)
ws-server 36.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/relay/src/lib/eth.ts 82.74% <100.00%> (+0.70%) ⬆️

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
process Build, test and deployment-process related tasks
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants