Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add errgroupcheck linter #4891

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexbagnolini
Copy link

errgroupcheck analyzes code and reports any usage of golang.org/x/sync/errgroup that is missing any call to the Wait() func.

All the examples reported in the errgroup documentation showcase the correct usage of the Wait() func to wait for all the coroutines to complete before proceeding.

Missing the Wait() call allows the code to compile just fine, but yields unexpected results due to the coroutines running without any wait for termination.

Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Hey, thank you for opening your first Pull Request !

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 2, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Aug 2, 2024

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

  • The CLA must be signed

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter (the team will help to verify that).
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed), and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • It must use Go version <= 1.21
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic().
  • It must not contain log.Fatal(), os.Exit(), or similar.
  • It must not modify the AST.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives (the team will help to verify that).
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must have integration tests without configuration (default).
  • They must have integration tests with configuration (if the linter has a configuration).

.golangci.next.reference.yml

  • The file .golangci.next.reference.yml must be updated.
  • The file .golangci.reference.yml must NOT be edited.
  • The linter must be added to the lists of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the lintersdb/builder_linter.go and .golangci.next.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter uses goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax -> no WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in lintersdb/builder_linter.go
    • if the linter uses goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo, it requires WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in lintersdb/builder_linter.go
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.
  • WithURL() must contain the URL of the repository.

Recommendations

  • The file jsonschema/golangci.next.jsonschema.json should be updated.
  • The file jsonschema/golangci.jsonschema.json must NOT be edited.
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary (useful to diagnose bug origins).
  • The linter repository should have a .gitignore (IDE files, binaries, OS files, etc. should not be committed)
  • A tag should never be recreated.
  • use main as the default branch name.

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

The code review will start after the completion of those checkboxes (except for the specific items that the team will help to verify).

The reviews should be addressed as commits (no squash).

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@ldez ldez added linter: new Support new linter feedback required Requires additional feedback labels Aug 2, 2024
@ldez ldez self-requested a review August 2, 2024 19:04
@Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor

Another yet case for uncalled

#3348

@alexbagnolini

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ldez

This comment was marked as outdated.

@alexbagnolini

This comment was marked as outdated.

@alexbagnolini
Copy link
Author

Can you help me understand this?

If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)

  • The values must be different from the default ones.
  • The default values must be defined in a comment.
  • The option must have a short description.

The only config available is to enable / disable the sole rule currently implemented.

Should I change the Default to be false and leave the value to true, or the opposite?

  errgroupcheck:
    # Check if any sync.errgroup.Group instance is missing a call to the Wait() func.
    # Default: true
    require-wait: true

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Aug 8, 2024

The "# Default:" should be the default value.
The value of the option should not be the default value.

    # Default: true
    require-wait: false

@ldez ldez changed the title Add new linter errgroupcheck Add errgroupcheck linter Aug 21, 2024
@Crocmagnon
Copy link
Contributor

Does the longer work for errgroups stored as struct attribute?
I have a use case where I’m creating a struct containing an errgroup in a "constructor", starting goroutines in a method of the struct and waiting in a third. What would that look like?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback required Requires additional feedback linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants