Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle null mesh pointers #2341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Handle null mesh pointers #2341

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

iche033
Copy link
Contributor

@iche033 iche033 commented Mar 23, 2024

🦟 Bug fix

Summary

In the same spirit as gazebosim/gz-rendering#982, this PR adds sanity checks for null pointers returned by common::MeshManager.

Checklist

  • Signed all commits for DCO
  • Added tests
  • Updated documentation (as needed)
  • Updated migration guide (as needed)
  • Consider updating Python bindings (if the library has them)
  • codecheck passed (See contributing)
  • All tests passed (See test coverage)
  • While waiting for a review on your PR, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by messages.

Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <[email protected]>
@iche033 iche033 requested a review from mjcarroll as a code owner March 23, 2024 00:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🎵 harmonic Gazebo Harmonic label Mar 23, 2024
@mjcarroll mjcarroll merged commit 5944188 into gz-sim8 Mar 25, 2024
6 of 9 checks passed
@mjcarroll mjcarroll deleted the null_mesh branch March 25, 2024 16:13
GauravKumar9920 pushed a commit to GauravKumar9920/gz-sim that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🎵 harmonic Gazebo Harmonic
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants