Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable baseline profiles in release workflow #101

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Syntey
Copy link
Contributor

@Syntey Syntey commented Dec 14, 2024

Due to #89

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Modified the GitHub Actions workflow for Android Google Play Release by disabling the step for generating baseline profiles.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file for Android Google Play Release, specifically focusing on the baseline profile generation step. The key change is the commenting out of the Gradle command responsible for generating release baseline profiles. This means that the process of creating baseline profiles, which typically helps optimize app performance, has been temporarily disabled.

A TODO comment has been added, suggesting that there might be an ongoing issue or future task related to this workflow step. The rest of the workflow remains intact, including environment setup, code checkout, app bundle generation, artifact handling, Play Store upload, and Slack notification processes.

The modification appears to be a deliberate pause in baseline profile generation, likely due to an underlying technical concern or investigation that requires further examination. The workflow's core functionality for releasing the Android application to Google Play remains unaffected by this specific change.

The change is minimal and surgical, targeting only the baseline profile generation command without disrupting the overall release workflow structure.

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/android_google_play_release.yml (1)

Action r0adkll/upload-google-play should be updated from v1.1.1 to v1.1.3

The current workflow uses version v1.1.1, while the latest available version is v1.1.3. Updating to the latest version is recommended to get bug fixes and improvements.

  • Update .github/workflows/android_google_play_release.yml to use r0adkll/[email protected]
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 58-67: Consider updating the Google Play upload action

The workflow uses r0adkll/[email protected] which might have updates available. Consider checking for a newer version that might include bug fixes or improvements.

Let's check the latest version:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the latest release version of the upload-google-play action
gh api repos/r0adkll/upload-google-play/releases/latest --jq .tag_name

Length of output: 79

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5ac3aa and eb43a22.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/android_google_play_release.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/android_google_play_release.yml (2)

36-37: Verify the impact of disabling baseline profiles

The change aligns with the PR objective. However, disabling baseline profiles might affect app startup performance. Please ensure that:

  1. The performance impact has been measured and is acceptable
  2. This is a temporary solution with a plan to re-enable profiles once issue Baseline profiles don't work on CI #89 is resolved

Let's check if baseline profiles are used in other workflows:

✅ Verification successful

Temporarily disabling baseline profiles is acceptable

The code analysis reveals this is a valid temporary workaround for issue #89. The baseline profile setup is properly configured in the project:

  • Baseline profile module is correctly set up with required dependencies
  • Android app module has proper baseline profile integration
  • The issue is specifically with CI environment execution, not the implementation

The performance impact of disabling profiles temporarily is an acceptable trade-off until the CI issue is resolved, as:

  1. Baseline profiles are only for optimization, not functionality
  2. The TODO comment properly tracks the issue
  3. The implementation remains intact for local development
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for baseline profile generation in other workflow files
rg -l "generateReleaseBaselineProfile" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 107


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for baseline profile configuration in Gradle files
rg -l "baselineProfile" -g "*.gradle*"

# Check for any other baseline profile related files
fd "baseline.*profile"

# Check the content of issue #89 to understand the context
gh issue view 89

Length of output: 567


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the baseline profile configuration in build files
cat androidApp/build.gradle.kts
cat baselineprofile/build.gradle.kts

# Check the baseline profile generator implementation
cat baselineprofile/src/main/kotlin/app/futured/kmptemplate/baselineprofile/BaselineProfileGenerator.kt

Length of output: 7296


Line range hint 11-14: Address pending TODO configurations

Several configuration items need attention:

  • Platform-specific Slack channel name is using a placeholder
  • Product flavor configuration needs verification
  • KMP_FLAVOR is set to 'prod' - verify if this is correct for release workflow

Let's check the available product flavors:

Copy link

6 Warnings
⚠️ Feature or fix PR title should include JIRA-ID and short description.
⚠️ Feature or fix PR branch name should include JIRA-ID and short description.
⚠️ KLIB resolver: The same 'unique_name=annotation_commonMain' found in more than one library: /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/feature/build/kotlinTransformedMetadataLibraries/nativeMain/androidx.annotation-annotation-1.7.0-commonMain-kNhS6A.klib, /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/feature/build/kotlinTransformedMetadataLibraries/nativeMain/org.jetbrains.compose.annotation-internal-annotation-1.7.0-commonMain-BD0V2w.klib
⚠️ KLIB resolver: The same 'unique_name=resources_commonMain' found in more than one library: /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/feature/build/kotlinTransformedMetadataLibraries/commonMain/dev.icerock.moko-resources-0.24.0-commonMain-3vAcDQ.klib, /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/resources/build/classes/kotlin/metadata/commonMain
⚠️ KLIB resolver: The same 'unique_name=runtime_commonMain' found in more than one library: /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/feature/build/kotlinTransformedMetadataLibraries/commonMain/org.jetbrains.compose.runtime-runtime-1.7.0-commonMain-9pDeVQ.klib, /Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/shared/feature/build/kotlinTransformedMetadataLibraries/nativeMain/app.cash.sqldelight-runtime-2.0.1-commonMain-wyRdBg.klib
⚠️ Search path '/Users/runnerm1/actions-runner/_work/kmp-futured-template/kmp-futured-template/iosApp/../shared/app/build/xcode-frameworks/Debug/iphonesimulator18.1' not found
2 Messages
📖 iosAppUITests: Executed 1 test, with 0 failures (0 expected) in 59.883 (59.883) seconds
📖 iosAppTests: Executed 1 test, with 0 failures (0 expected) in 0.001 (0.001) seconds

Generated by 🚫 Danger

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants