Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Сборка новых образов #56

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2024

Conversation

nixel2007
Copy link
Member

@nixel2007 nixel2007 commented Nov 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded the build process to include additional Docker build scripts, enhancing the variety of images created.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Maintained consistent error handling and control flow in the workflow.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request focus on the .github/workflows/build.yml file, where the script matrix in the build job has been expanded to include three new build scripts. This brings the total number of scripts executed during the build process to nine. The overall structure and logic of the workflow remain unchanged, with the job still dependent on the successful completion of the previous workflow run and executing on ubuntu-latest.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml Expanded the script matrix in the build job to include build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh, build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh, and build-edt-k8s-agent.sh, totaling nine scripts. No changes to job conditions, permissions, or environment variables.

Possibly related PRs

  • Сборка образов 1с #45: The changes in this PR also modify the .github/workflows/build.yml file, specifically the script matrix, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the addition of new build scripts.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New scripts hop in, brightening the day.
Build jobs grow with a joyful cheer,
Docker images, oh so near!
With every run, we leap and bound,
In our coding burrow, joy is found! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

20-20: Consider build optimization strategies

With the matrix expanded to 9 parallel builds, consider the following optimization suggestions:

  1. Consider grouping related builds (e.g., all k8s agents) to share build cache
  2. Implement layer caching using GitHub Actions cache to speed up builds

Example implementation for Docker layer caching:

    - name: Set up Docker Buildx
      uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+     with:
+       buildkitd-flags: --debug
+
+   - name: Cache Docker layers
+     uses: actions/cache@v3
+     with:
+       path: /tmp/.buildx-cache
+       key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }}
+       restore-keys: |
+         ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1291bc7 and 63645e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml (2)

20-20: Verify the existence of new build scripts

The matrix has been expanded to include three new build scripts. Let's verify that these scripts exist in the repository.

✅ Verification successful

All build scripts are present and accessible

All 9 build scripts referenced in the matrix configuration exist in the repository and are accessible, including the newly added scripts:

  • build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh
  • build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh
  • build-edt-k8s-agent.sh
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all build scripts exist and are executable

# List all build scripts from the matrix
SCRIPTS=(
    "build-base-k8s-jenkins-agent.sh"
    "build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh"
    "build-base-swarm-jenkins-agent.sh"
    "build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh"
    "build-edt-swarm-agent.sh"
    "build-edt-k8s-agent.sh"
    "build-oscript-k8s-agent.sh"
    "build-oscript-swarm-agent.sh"
    "build-server.sh"
)

# Check each script
for script in "${SCRIPTS[@]}"; do
    echo "Checking $script..."
    if [[ ! -f "$script" ]]; then
        echo "ERROR: $script does not exist"
    elif [[ ! -x "$script" ]]; then
        echo "WARNING: $script is not executable"
    fi
done

Length of output: 2198


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the actual location of these scripts in the repository
fd -t f -e sh "build-.*agent|build-server"

Length of output: 314


20-20: Review environment variables for new agents

The new coverage agents might require additional environment variables or configurations. Please verify if the existing environment variables (ONEC_USERNAME, ONEC_PASSWORD, etc.) are sufficient for the new agent types.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the environment variables used in the new coverage agents and compare them with existing agents to ensure completeness.


Environment variables are properly configured for new agents

After analyzing the scripts, I can confirm that all necessary environment variables are properly configured. The new coverage agents use the same core variables (DOCKER_LOGIN, DOCKER_PASSWORD, DOCKER_REGISTRY_URL, ONEC_VERSION) as the existing agents, plus they correctly include the new required variables (EDT_VERSION, COVERAGE41C_VERSION) which are already defined in the workflow.

The environment variables usage is consistent across all agent types:

  • Common Docker variables for registry access
  • Base version tags for image building
  • Specific version variables for tools (EDT, Coverage41C)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for environment variable usage in build scripts

# Search for environment variable references in new scripts
echo "Checking environment variable usage in new scripts..."
for script in "build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh" "build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh" "build-edt-k8s-agent.sh"; do
    if [ -f "$script" ]; then
        echo "=== $script ==="
        # Look for environment variable usage
        rg -n '\$\{?[A-Z_]+\}?' "$script" || echo "No environment variables found"
    fi
done

Length of output: 2931


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check environment variables in existing agent scripts for comparison
echo "Checking environment variables in existing base agent scripts..."
for script in "build-base-k8s-jenkins-agent.sh" "build-base-swarm-jenkins-agent.sh"; do
    if [ -f "$script" ]; then
        echo "=== $script ==="
        rg -n '\$\{?[A-Z_]+\}?' "$script" || echo "No environment variables found"
    fi
done

# Also check if there are any environment variable definitions in workflow files
echo -e "\nChecking environment variables defined in workflow..."
rg -n 'env:' .github/workflows/ -A 10

Length of output: 5302

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant