-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Сборка новых образов #56
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
20-20
: Consider build optimization strategiesWith the matrix expanded to 9 parallel builds, consider the following optimization suggestions:
- Consider grouping related builds (e.g., all k8s agents) to share build cache
- Implement layer caching using GitHub Actions cache to speed up builds
Example implementation for Docker layer caching:
- name: Set up Docker Buildx uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 + with: + buildkitd-flags: --debug + + - name: Cache Docker layers + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: /tmp/.buildx-cache + key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml (2)
20-20
: Verify the existence of new build scripts
The matrix has been expanded to include three new build scripts. Let's verify that these scripts exist in the repository.
✅ Verification successful
All build scripts are present and accessible
All 9 build scripts referenced in the matrix configuration exist in the repository and are accessible, including the newly added scripts:
- build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh
- build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh
- build-edt-k8s-agent.sh
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all build scripts exist and are executable
# List all build scripts from the matrix
SCRIPTS=(
"build-base-k8s-jenkins-agent.sh"
"build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh"
"build-base-swarm-jenkins-agent.sh"
"build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh"
"build-edt-swarm-agent.sh"
"build-edt-k8s-agent.sh"
"build-oscript-k8s-agent.sh"
"build-oscript-swarm-agent.sh"
"build-server.sh"
)
# Check each script
for script in "${SCRIPTS[@]}"; do
echo "Checking $script..."
if [[ ! -f "$script" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: $script does not exist"
elif [[ ! -x "$script" ]]; then
echo "WARNING: $script is not executable"
fi
done
Length of output: 2198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the actual location of these scripts in the repository
fd -t f -e sh "build-.*agent|build-server"
Length of output: 314
20-20
: Review environment variables for new agents
The new coverage agents might require additional environment variables or configurations. Please verify if the existing environment variables (ONEC_USERNAME
, ONEC_PASSWORD
, etc.) are sufficient for the new agent types.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the environment variables used in the new coverage agents and compare them with existing agents to ensure completeness.
Environment variables are properly configured for new agents
After analyzing the scripts, I can confirm that all necessary environment variables are properly configured. The new coverage agents use the same core variables (DOCKER_LOGIN
, DOCKER_PASSWORD
, DOCKER_REGISTRY_URL
, ONEC_VERSION
) as the existing agents, plus they correctly include the new required variables (EDT_VERSION
, COVERAGE41C_VERSION
) which are already defined in the workflow.
The environment variables usage is consistent across all agent types:
- Common Docker variables for registry access
- Base version tags for image building
- Specific version variables for tools (EDT, Coverage41C)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for environment variable usage in build scripts
# Search for environment variable references in new scripts
echo "Checking environment variable usage in new scripts..."
for script in "build-base-k8s-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh" "build-base-swarm-jenkins-coverage-agent.sh" "build-edt-k8s-agent.sh"; do
if [ -f "$script" ]; then
echo "=== $script ==="
# Look for environment variable usage
rg -n '\$\{?[A-Z_]+\}?' "$script" || echo "No environment variables found"
fi
done
Length of output: 2931
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check environment variables in existing agent scripts for comparison
echo "Checking environment variables in existing base agent scripts..."
for script in "build-base-k8s-jenkins-agent.sh" "build-base-swarm-jenkins-agent.sh"; do
if [ -f "$script" ]; then
echo "=== $script ==="
rg -n '\$\{?[A-Z_]+\}?' "$script" || echo "No environment variables found"
fi
done
# Also check if there are any environment variable definitions in workflow files
echo -e "\nChecking environment variables defined in workflow..."
rg -n 'env:' .github/workflows/ -A 10
Length of output: 5302
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes