Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #1082 from mdqst/patch-1
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Typo Update citizen-house-overview.mdx
  • Loading branch information
krofax authored Nov 12, 2024
2 parents 3ed6fde + 25f8799 commit 1537c15
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions pages/citizens-house/citizen-house-overview.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ The goals of the Citizens' House are to:
## Responsibilities
In its current phase, the Citizens' House is responsible for voting on the allocation of Retroactive Public Goods Funding (Retro Funding), and has the power to veto protocol upgrade proposals made by the Token House.

The Citizens' House is in an initial bootstrapping phase, and will take on progressively more governance responsibilities over tme, such as determining scope and round sizing. Holding a voting badge in this initial stage does not guarantee permanent participation in the Citizens’ House and future iterations of Retro Funding.
The Citizens' House is in an initial bootstrapping phase, and will take on progressively more governance responsibilities over time, such as determining scope and round sizing. Holding a voting badge in this initial stage does not guarantee permanent participation in the Citizens’ House and future iterations of Retro Funding.

## Moving Forward

In future phases, the Citizens’ House may gain additional governance powers. For example, in addition to voting on Retro Funding and protocol upgrade vetoes, the Citizens’ House may work alongside the Token House to govern allocation of surplus protocol revenue and collaborate on criteria for participation in the Citizens’ House. You can [read more about this transition here](https://optimism.mirror.xyz/PLrAQgE1EGRo7GRrFoztplFChnUZda4DFGW3dkQayxY).
In future phases, the Citizens’ House may gain additional governance powers. For example, in addition to voting on Retro Funding and protocol upgrade vetoes, the Citizens’ House may work alongside the Token House to govern allocation of surplus protocol revenue and collaborate on criteria for participation in the Citizens’ House. You can [read more about this transition here](https://optimism.mirror.xyz/PLrAQgE1EGRo7GRrFoztplFChnUZda4DFGW3dkQayxY).

0 comments on commit 1537c15

Please sign in to comment.