-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix panics for UART #434
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix panics for UART #434
Conversation
- Default rx/tx_buffer_size in uart_driver_install - Make not covered ResetReason as Unknown
esp_reset_reason_t_ESP_RST_BROWNOUT => Self::Brownout, | ||
esp_reset_reason_t_ESP_RST_TASK_WDT => Self::TaskWatchdog, | ||
esp_reset_reason_t_ESP_RST_DEEPSLEEP => Self::DeepSleep, | ||
_ => unreachable!(), | ||
_ => Self::Unknown, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind altering it so that Self::Unknown
becomes a catch all.
But: you are not fixing the root cause why it panicked in the first place, isn't it?
- It didn't panic because of
esp_reset_reason_t_ESP_RST_UNKNOWN
because we have that branch - It panicked because of something else
So... how about we map this something else (whatever it is) in the match
statement? I mean in addition to the change you introduce here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I'll look at the reset reason code and add it to the enum. @ivmarkov Did you mean this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes.
} else { | ||
0 | ||
}, | ||
UART_FIFO_SIZE * 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However.... why do we need this? Are you having problems with TX as well, or are you doing it "just in case"? IMO this is not necessary, because the TX assert is slightly different: https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/blob/a322e6bdad4b6675d4597fb2722eea2851ba88cb/components/driver/uart/uart.c#L1589
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree. Cancel changes
Default rx/tx_buffer_size in uart_driver_install
This is necessary because esp-idf requires a non-zero buffer size for the UART (see this issue)
Make not covered ResetReason as Unknown
I believe that this applies to the UART, since for me the only ResetReason that is not covered is a reset via the UART (for example, by pressing Ctrl+R when connected via espflash). I don’t see a problem making this reason as unknown. As for me, panicking when trying to get ResetReason is not the best idea