Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code Cleanup: Java 16 instanceof pattern matching in pde.ui #713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

alshamams
Copy link
Contributor

The commit tries to implement a code cleanup in pattern matching using instanceof operator according to Java 16 guidelines, making the code more concise.
The change has been applied in org.eclipse.pde.ui project.

Kindly review @akurtakov @iloveeclipse @vik-chand @gireeshpunathil and do let me know in case of any edits.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

There are removed comments which shouldn't happen . Please check and fix.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 17, 2023

Test Results

   267 files   -        6     267 suites   - 6   53m 32s ⏱️ - 20m 46s
3 341 tests +       1  3 310 ✔️ +       1  30 💤 ±  0  1 +1 
7 596 runs   - 2 721  7 529 ✔️  - 2 697  66 💤  - 24  1 +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5e9c236. ± Comparison against base commit a19c8ed.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

Please rebase on top of master as there are conflicts.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

There is conflict. Would you please fix it and rebase on top of master.

@alshamams
Copy link
Contributor Author

There is conflict. Would you please fix it and rebase on top of master.

Hi @akurtakov ,
Will do as soon as possible. I had been on vacation, the last couple of days.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@akurtakov akurtakov merged commit 50803ee into eclipse-pde:master Sep 22, 2023
12 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants