Feature/generate ostream operators

[trittsv]

fixes #467

This pull requests generates ostream operators for each type.

[trittsv]

Hi @eboasson, could you please have a look at this PR? Would be great 😃

[eboasson]

I actually started looking at it yesterday afternoon ☺️ The first impression was fine, but there are a few things I want to check/make sure I understand:

• Why the bump from C++14 to C++17 is needed. (I am fine with it, I think ROS2 did that, too, but I'd like to understand it. I also want to be sure can still build C++11 code with it in a pinch.)
• Whether it plays nice with the possibility of using some other type than std::vector<T> and similar cases (so -f sequence-template, -f string-template, etc.)
• Whether it can easily be used to (finally) implement serdata_print
• What the generated code looks like 🙂

You can probably answer some of these straightaway, but as I like to really check any code that goes in you can only save me so much time by providing them 😂

[trittsv]

ah great @eboasson, here are my answers:

• i had to bump some to c++17 where (generator->uses_array || generator->uses_sequence || generator->uses_bounded_sequence || generator->uses_optional) because of the usage of std::optional. Otherwise i would have to split the file rc/ddscxx/include/org/eclipse/cyclonedds/util/ostream_operators.hpp into multiple files where each containing only vector, array, optional etc. None of the examples used optional so it was not necessary so far. But i can split the file if you like to remove the c++17 from the examples?
• -f sequence-template, -f string-template should work fine. The only thing that could happen is that the custom type may need to provide a ostream operator.
• What is the usecase for serdata_print?
  Where can i call the function to test it?

template <typename T>
size_t serdata_print(
  const ddsi_sertype* tpcmn, const ddsi_serdata* dcmn, char* buf, size_t bufsize)
{
  (void)tpcmn;
  (void)dcmn;
  //implementation to follow!!!

  std::stringstream ss;
  ss << static_cast<T*>(dcmn->loan->sample_ptr);
  std::string sample_as_string = ss.str();

  std::cout << "sample printed" << sample_as_string << std::endl;

  if (bufsize > 0)
    buf[0] = 0x0;
  return 0;
}

• Here are examples of the generated code (the idls from the ddscxx tests)
  generated-code.zip

[eboasson]

Good that I asked: another look at the changes with your answers in mind sufficed 😀

• i had to bump some to c++17 where (generator->uses_array || generator->uses_sequence || generator->uses_bounded_sequence || generator->uses_optional) because of the usage of std::optional. Otherwise i would have to split the file rc/ddscxx/include/org/eclipse/cyclonedds/util/ostream_operators.hpp into multiple files where each containing only vector, array, optional etc. None of the examples used optional so it was not necessary so far. But i can split the file if you like to remove the c++17 from the examples?

I think especially for the examples there is no point in avoiding C++17. Just about everyone has access to a C++17 compiler these days, so it is only the older embedded and/or regulated and/or corporate stuff that might not be able to use it for production code. Supporting those cases is nice, but to put effort into examples ... nah.

• -f sequence-template, -f string-template should work fine. The only thing that could happen is that the custom type may need to provide a ostream operator.

I now see what you mean. I think that's a perfectly sensible expectation.

• What is the usecase for serdata_print?

The trace files can include the content of samples, that's when it uses serdata_print. In other situations (involving OpenSplice) I've found it to be a very useful feature when trying to understand what exactly is going on in some complicated scenario involving a lot of different things, and so I retained it in Cyclone.

If you do Tracing/Category = trace and look for lines with write_sample or application you can easily find cases where it dumps the contents. If you take the C "hello world", you have the contents, if you use the C++ one, you see no contents.

With your suggested implementation, that should change.

I do consider that separate from this PR: to me, this PR simply makes that possible, and there's no point in delaying the merging of it because it enables this small improvement.