feat: move search to Web Worker #469
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for easyops-cn-docusaurus-search-local ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (2)
- docusaurus-search-local/package.json: Language not supported
- docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/fetchIndexes.spec.ts: Evaluated as low risk
Comments skipped due to low confidence (3)
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts:37
- [nitpick] The function name 'lowLevelFetchIndexes' is ambiguous. Consider renaming it to 'fetchIndexesFromCache' to better describe its purpose.
async lowLevelFetchIndexes(
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts:130
- The error message 'Unexpected version url' could be more descriptive. Consider changing it to 'Unexpected version URL: The URL does not match the expected origin.'
throw new Error("Unexpected version url");
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts:32
- The new 'SearchWorker' class and its methods should have corresponding test cases to ensure the new functionality is covered by tests.
export class SearchWorker {
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/searchByWorker.ts (1)
18-20: Consider improving type safetyThe use of
as anycould be replaced with proper typing to maintain type safety.- ) as any; + ) as Comlink.Remote<typeof RemoteWorker>;docusaurus-search-local/package.json (1)
42-42: LGTM! Good choice using Comlink for Worker communication.The addition of Comlink is appropriate for implementing WebWorker-based search. This architectural change will improve main thread performance by offloading search operations to a worker thread.
Consider documenting the following in your README:
- Browser compatibility requirements (WebWorker support)
- Performance benefits of worker-based search
- Fallback behavior if WebWorkers are not available
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts (1)
83-86: Ensureitem.document.iis defined to prevent potential errorsIn the filter condition, accessing
item.document.i.toString()assumes thatitem.document.iis always defined. If it'sundefinedornull, this will cause a runtime error. Consider adding a null check to ensure safety.Apply this diff to add a null check:
!results.some( (item) => - item.document.i.toString() === result.ref + item.document.i && item.document.i.toString() === result.ref )docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchPage/SearchPage.tsx (1)
96-96: IncludeupdateSearchPathin the dependency array or memoize it.The function
updateSearchPathis used inside theuseEffectbut is not included in the dependency array. This can lead to stale closures or unexpected behavior. Consider memoizingupdateSearchPathusinguseCallbackor including it in the dependencies.docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/SearchBar.tsx (2)
150-152: Capture all resolved values fromPromise.allor adjust the implementationIn the
loadIndexfunction, you're usingPromise.allbut only destructuringautoComplete:const [autoComplete] = await Promise.all([ fetchAutoCompleteJS(), fetchIndexesByWorker(versionUrl, searchContext), ]);This means the result of
fetchIndexesByWorkeris not captured. IffetchIndexesByWorkerreturns a value that's needed, consider capturing it. If it's only necessary to ensure the indexes are fetched before proceeding, and the return value isn't needed, you might separate the calls for clarity.Consider one of the following adjustments:
Option 1: Capture both results
const [autoComplete, indexes] = await Promise.all([ fetchAutoCompleteJS(), fetchIndexesByWorker(versionUrl, searchContext), ]); // Use 'indexes' if neededOption 2: Separate the calls if the result isn't needed
const autoComplete = await fetchAutoCompleteJS(); await fetchIndexesByWorker(versionUrl, searchContext);This makes it explicit that
fetchIndexesByWorkeris called for its side effects.
261-266: Implement debouncing to improve performanceThe
sourcefunction callssearchByWorkeron every input change without debouncing. Rapid input can result in a high number of calls, potentially impacting performance and overwhelming the worker.Consider implementing a debounce mechanism:
+ import debounce from 'lodash.debounce'; ... source: debounce( async ( input: string, callback: (output: SearchResult[]) => void ) => { try { const result = await searchByWorker( versionUrl, searchContext, input ); callback(result); } catch (error) { console.error("Error during search:", error); callback([]); } }, + 300 // Debounce delay in milliseconds ),This adds a 300ms delay, reducing the number of calls during rapid typing.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
docusaurus-search-local/package.json(1 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/SearchBar.tsx(3 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/fetchIndexes.spec.ts(0 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/fetchIndexes.ts(0 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchPage/SearchPage.tsx(4 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/searchByWorker.ts(1 hunks)docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/fetchIndexes.spec.ts
- docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/fetchIndexes.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/searchByWorker.ts (2)
1-11: LGTM! Clean interface design
The RemoteWorker interface is well-defined with proper TypeScript types and Promise return values.
19-19: Verify worker implementation
Ensure that the referenced worker file exists and implements the expected interface.
✅ Verification successful
Worker implementation verified successfully
The worker implementation is properly implemented in worker.ts with the expected interface:
- The
SearchWorkerclass implements both required methods:fetchIndexesandsearch - The worker is correctly exposed using Comlink
- The implementation in
searchByWorker.tsproperly wraps and uses the worker
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if worker.js exists and contains the expected implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
async fetchIndexes($_) {
$$$
}
async search($_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if worker.js exists in the same directory
fd worker.js
# Then let's examine its content
rg -l "class.*Worker" --type ts
rg "onmessage|postMessage" --type ts -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of the worker.ts file
cat docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts
# Also check for any imports in searchByWorker.ts that might be related
cat docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/searchByWorker.ts
Length of output: 5762
docusaurus-search-local/package.json (1)
42-42: Verify the impact on bundle size.
Let's analyze the bundle size impact of adding Comlink.
✅ Verification successful
Comlink's bundle impact is minimal and acceptable
The analysis shows that Comlink is very lightweight:
- Minified size: 4.85KB
- Gzipped size: 2.03KB
- Zero dependencies
- Tree-shakeable (ESM support via dist/esm/comlink.mjs)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the minified size of comlink to understand bundle impact
# Get the size of comlink's minified bundle
curl -s https://bundlephobia.com/api/size?[email protected] | jq '{
size: .size,
gzip: .gzip,
dependencyCount: .dependencyCount
}'
# Verify if comlink is tree-shakeable
curl -s https://bundlephobia.com/api/size?[email protected] | jq '.hasJSModule'
Length of output: 312
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchPage/SearchPage.tsx (2)
11-11: Import statements updated to include worker-based functions.
The import of fetchIndexesByWorker and searchByWorker correctly integrates the new worker-based search functionality.
200-200: Loading indicator correctly reflects worker readiness.
The conditional rendering ensures the loading spinner is displayed while the search worker is initializing and a search query is present.
docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/SearchBar.tsx (2)
19-19: Confirm the correctness of the new import statement
The import of fetchIndexesByWorker and searchByWorker from "../searchByWorker" appears correct based on the context of migrating to a worker-based approach. Ensure that the searchByWorker module exports these functions properly and that the file path is accurate.
261-266: Ensure worker termination to prevent memory leaks
If searchByWorker creates workers on each call, verify that workers are properly terminated when they're no longer needed. This prevents potential memory leaks, especially with continuous use.
Run the following script to check for worker termination in the codebase:
Ensure that for every Worker instance created, there is a corresponding terminate() call.
✅ Verification successful
Worker management is properly implemented - no memory leak concerns
The implementation uses a singleton pattern with proper caching:
- A single worker instance is created and reused via
getRemoteWorker() - The worker is wrapped using Comlink and cached in
remoteWorkerPromise - The worker maintains its own cache of fetched indexes using
cacheMap - No explicit termination is needed as the worker is kept alive intentionally for reuse
Since the worker is reused throughout the application lifecycle rather than creating new workers for each search, there is no risk of memory leaks from unterminated workers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for `Worker` instances and ensure that `terminate()` is called.
# Find all TypeScript files
fd -e ts
# Search for Worker creation
rg 'new Worker\(' -g '*.ts'
# Check if terminate() is called on workers
rg 'worker\.terminate\(' -g '*.ts'
Length of output: 4678
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the worker implementation and usage more thoroughly
# First, check the content of searchByWorker.ts to understand worker lifecycle
cat docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/searchByWorker.ts
# Also check the worker implementation
cat docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/worker.ts
# Look for any worker cleanup in SearchBar component
rg -A 5 -B 5 'searchByWorker' docusaurus-search-local/src/client/theme/SearchBar/SearchBar.tsx
Length of output: 6580
| export async function searchByWorker( | ||
| baseUrl: string, | ||
| searchContext: string, | ||
| input: string | ||
| ): Promise<SearchResult[]> { | ||
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | ||
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | ||
| return remoteWorker!.search(baseUrl, searchContext, input); | ||
| } | ||
| return []; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for search operation
Similar to fetchIndexesByWorker, this function should handle potential errors gracefully.
export async function searchByWorker(
baseUrl: string,
searchContext: string,
input: string
): Promise<SearchResult[]> {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") {
- const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker();
- return remoteWorker!.search(baseUrl, searchContext, input);
+ try {
+ const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker();
+ return await remoteWorker.search(baseUrl, searchContext, input);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Search operation failed:', error);
+ return [];
+ }
}
return [];
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function searchByWorker( | |
| baseUrl: string, | |
| searchContext: string, | |
| input: string | |
| ): Promise<SearchResult[]> { | |
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | |
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | |
| return remoteWorker!.search(baseUrl, searchContext, input); | |
| } | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| export async function searchByWorker( | |
| baseUrl: string, | |
| searchContext: string, | |
| input: string | |
| ): Promise<SearchResult[]> { | |
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | |
| try { | |
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | |
| return await remoteWorker.search(baseUrl, searchContext, input); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Search operation failed:', error); | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return []; | |
| } |
| function getRemoteWorker() { | ||
| if (!remoteWorkerPromise) { | ||
| remoteWorkerPromise = (async () => { | ||
| const Remote = Comlink.wrap( | ||
| new Worker(new URL("./worker.js", import.meta.url)) | ||
| ) as any; | ||
| return await new Remote(); | ||
| })(); | ||
| } | ||
| return remoteWorkerPromise; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for worker initialization
The worker initialization could fail for various reasons (e.g., worker file not found). Consider adding error handling.
function getRemoteWorker() {
if (!remoteWorkerPromise) {
remoteWorkerPromise = (async () => {
- const Remote = Comlink.wrap(
- new Worker(new URL("./worker.js", import.meta.url))
- ) as any;
- return await new Remote();
+ try {
+ const Remote = Comlink.wrap(
+ new Worker(new URL("./worker.js", import.meta.url))
+ ) as Comlink.Remote<typeof RemoteWorker>;
+ return await new Remote();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to initialize search worker:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
})();
}
return remoteWorkerPromise;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function getRemoteWorker() { | |
| if (!remoteWorkerPromise) { | |
| remoteWorkerPromise = (async () => { | |
| const Remote = Comlink.wrap( | |
| new Worker(new URL("./worker.js", import.meta.url)) | |
| ) as any; | |
| return await new Remote(); | |
| })(); | |
| } | |
| return remoteWorkerPromise; | |
| } | |
| function getRemoteWorker() { | |
| if (!remoteWorkerPromise) { | |
| remoteWorkerPromise = (async () => { | |
| try { | |
| const Remote = Comlink.wrap( | |
| new Worker(new URL("./worker.js", import.meta.url)) | |
| ) as Comlink.Remote<typeof RemoteWorker>; | |
| return await new Remote(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to initialize search worker:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| })(); | |
| } | |
| return remoteWorkerPromise; | |
| } |
| export async function fetchIndexesByWorker( | ||
| baseUrl: string, | ||
| searchContext: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> { | ||
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | ||
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | ||
| await remoteWorker!.fetchIndexes(baseUrl, searchContext); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and return type consistency
The function could benefit from proper error handling and consistent return types.
export async function fetchIndexesByWorker(
baseUrl: string,
searchContext: string
): Promise<void> {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") {
- const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker();
- await remoteWorker!.fetchIndexes(baseUrl, searchContext);
+ try {
+ const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker();
+ await remoteWorker.fetchIndexes(baseUrl, searchContext);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch indexes:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
+ } else {
+ // Explicitly return in non-production environment
+ return Promise.resolve();
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function fetchIndexesByWorker( | |
| baseUrl: string, | |
| searchContext: string | |
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | |
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | |
| await remoteWorker!.fetchIndexes(baseUrl, searchContext); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export async function fetchIndexesByWorker( | |
| baseUrl: string, | |
| searchContext: string | |
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "production") { | |
| try { | |
| const remoteWorker = await getRemoteWorker(); | |
| await remoteWorker.fetchIndexes(baseUrl, searchContext); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch indexes:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| // Explicitly return in non-production environment | |
| return Promise.resolve(); | |
| } | |
| } |
| (doc) => doc.i.toString() === result.ref | ||
| ) as SearchDocument; | ||
| return { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for undefined when finding documents to prevent runtime errors
The find method may return undefined if the document is not found. Casting it directly to SearchDocument without checking can cause runtime errors. Add a check to ensure that document is defined before proceeding.
Apply this diff to add a check:
const document = documents.find(
(doc) => doc.i.toString() === result.ref
- ) as SearchDocument;
+ );
+ if (!document) {
+ // Handle the missing document scenario
+ return null; // or continue to next iteration
+ }
+ // Now it's safe to assert the type
+ const searchDocument = document as SearchDocument;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| (doc) => doc.i.toString() === result.ref | |
| ) as SearchDocument; | |
| return { | |
| const document = documents.find( | |
| (doc) => doc.i.toString() === result.ref | |
| ); | |
| if (!document) { | |
| // Handle the missing document scenario | |
| return null; // or continue to next iteration | |
| } | |
| // Now it's safe to assert the type | |
| const searchDocument = document as SearchDocument; | |
| return { |
| const { wrappedIndexes, zhDictionary } = await this.lowLevelFetchIndexes( | ||
| baseUrl, | ||
| searchContext | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling when fetching indexes in the search method
The call to this.lowLevelFetchIndexes may throw an error if fetching indexes fails. Currently, there's no error handling, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections. Wrap the call in a try-catch block to handle errors gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
let wrappedIndexes, zhDictionary;
try {
const data = await this.lowLevelFetchIndexes(
baseUrl,
searchContext
);
wrappedIndexes = data.wrappedIndexes;
zhDictionary = data.zhDictionary;
} catch (error) {
// Handle the error appropriately, e.g., log it or return an empty array
console.error('Failed to fetch indexes:', error);
return [];
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { wrappedIndexes, zhDictionary } = await this.lowLevelFetchIndexes( | |
| baseUrl, | |
| searchContext | |
| ); | |
| let wrappedIndexes, zhDictionary; | |
| try { | |
| const data = await this.lowLevelFetchIndexes( | |
| baseUrl, | |
| searchContext | |
| ); | |
| wrappedIndexes = data.wrappedIndexes; | |
| zhDictionary = data.zhDictionary; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., log it or return an empty array | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch indexes:', error); | |
| return []; | |
| } |
| if (/\p{Unified_Ideograph}/u.test(tuple[0][0])) { | ||
| acc.add(tuple[0]); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for undefined elements before accessing to prevent runtime errors
When accessing tuple[0][0], there's an assumption that tuple[0] and tuple[0][0] exist. If the data is malformed, this could cause a runtime error. Add checks to ensure these elements are defined.
Apply this diff to add safety checks:
for (const tuple of item.index.invertedIndex) {
- if (/\p{Unified_Ideograph}/u.test(tuple[0][0])) {
+ if (
+ tuple[0] &&
+ tuple[0][0] &&
+ /\p{Unified_Ideograph}/u.test(tuple[0][0])
+ ) {
acc.add(tuple[0]);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (/\p{Unified_Ideograph}/u.test(tuple[0][0])) { | |
| acc.add(tuple[0]); | |
| } | |
| if ( | |
| tuple[0] && | |
| tuple[0][0] && | |
| /\p{Unified_Ideograph}/u.test(tuple[0][0]) | |
| ) { | |
| acc.add(tuple[0]); | |
| } |
| const json = (await (await fetch(url)).json()) as SerializedIndex[]; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for fetch and JSON parsing operations
The fetch request and JSON parsing don't have error handling. Network failures or invalid JSON responses can cause unhandled exceptions. Wrap these operations in try-catch blocks to handle errors gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
- const json = (await (await fetch(url)).json()) as SerializedIndex[];
+ let response;
+ try {
+ response = await fetch(url);
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to fetch indexes from ${url}: ${error.message}`);
+ }
+ let json;
+ try {
+ json = (await response.json()) as SerializedIndex[];
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to parse JSON from ${url}: ${error.message}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const json = (await (await fetch(url)).json()) as SerializedIndex[]; | |
| let response; | |
| try { | |
| response = await fetch(url); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to fetch indexes from ${url}: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| let json; | |
| try { | |
| json = (await response.json()) as SerializedIndex[]; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to parse JSON from ${url}: ${error.message}`); | |
| } |
| if ( | ||
| !Array.isArray(searchContextByPaths) || | ||
| searchContext || | ||
| useAllContextsWithNoSearchContext | ||
| ? await fetchIndexes(versionUrl, searchContext) | ||
| : { wrappedIndexes: [], zhDictionary: [] }; | ||
| setSearchSource(() => | ||
| SearchSourceFactory(wrappedIndexes, zhDictionary, 100) | ||
| ); | ||
| ) { | ||
| await fetchIndexesByWorker(versionUrl, searchContext); | ||
| } | ||
| setSearchWorkerReady(true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add missing dependencies to the useEffect dependency array.
The variables searchContextByPaths and useAllContextsWithNoSearchContext are used inside the useEffect but are not included in the dependency array. To ensure the effect runs correctly when these variables change, include them in the dependencies.
Apply this diff to include the missing dependencies:
useEffect(() => {
async function doFetchIndexes() {
if (
!Array.isArray(searchContextByPaths) ||
searchContext ||
useAllContextsWithNoSearchContext
) {
await fetchIndexesByWorker(versionUrl, searchContext);
}
setSearchWorkerReady(true);
}
doFetchIndexes();
-}, [searchContext, versionUrl]);
+}, [searchContext, versionUrl, searchContextByPaths, useAllContextsWithNoSearchContext]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if (searchQuery) { | ||
| (async () => { | ||
| const results = await searchByWorker( | ||
| versionUrl, | ||
| searchContext, | ||
| searchQuery | ||
| ); | ||
| setSearchResults(results); | ||
| })(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setSearchResults(undefined); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor: Avoid defining async functions inside useEffect.
Defining an async function inside a useEffect hook can lead to unintentional side effects. Consider refactoring to define the async function outside the hook.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
useEffect(() => {
updateSearchPath(searchQuery);
- if (searchQuery) {
- (async () => {
- const results = await searchByWorker(
- versionUrl,
- searchContext,
- searchQuery
- );
- setSearchResults(results);
- })();
- } else {
- setSearchResults(undefined);
- }
+ const fetchResults = async () => {
+ if (searchQuery) {
+ const results = await searchByWorker(
+ versionUrl,
+ searchContext,
+ searchQuery
+ );
+ setSearchResults(results);
+ } else {
+ setSearchResults(undefined);
+ }
+ };
+ fetchResults();
}, [searchQuery, versionUrl, searchContext]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (searchQuery) { | |
| (async () => { | |
| const results = await searchByWorker( | |
| versionUrl, | |
| searchContext, | |
| searchQuery | |
| ); | |
| setSearchResults(results); | |
| })(); | |
| } else { | |
| setSearchResults(undefined); | |
| const fetchResults = async () => { | |
| if (searchQuery) { | |
| const results = await searchByWorker( | |
| versionUrl, | |
| searchContext, | |
| searchQuery | |
| ); | |
| setSearchResults(results); | |
| } else { | |
| setSearchResults(undefined); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| fetchResults(); |
| source: async ( | ||
| input: string, | ||
| callback: (output: SearchResult[]) => void | ||
| ) => { | ||
| const result = await searchByWorker( | ||
| versionUrl, | ||
| searchContext, | ||
| input | ||
| ); | ||
| callback(result); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling to the asynchronous source function
The source function used in the autocomplete configuration is asynchronous but lacks error handling. If searchByWorker throws an error, it could lead to unhandled promise rejections, impacting the user experience.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
source: async (
input: string,
callback: (output: SearchResult[]) => void
) => {
+ try {
const result = await searchByWorker(
versionUrl,
searchContext,
input
);
callback(result);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Error during search:", error);
+ callback([]);
+ }
},This ensures that any errors are caught, logged, and the autocomplete doesn't break.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| source: async ( | |
| input: string, | |
| callback: (output: SearchResult[]) => void | |
| ) => { | |
| const result = await searchByWorker( | |
| versionUrl, | |
| searchContext, | |
| input | |
| ); | |
| callback(result); | |
| }, | |
| source: async ( | |
| input: string, | |
| callback: (output: SearchResult[]) => void | |
| ) => { | |
| try { | |
| const result = await searchByWorker( | |
| versionUrl, | |
| searchContext, | |
| input | |
| ); | |
| callback(result); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error during search:", error); | |
| callback([]); | |
| } | |
| }, |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
These changes aim to provide a more efficient and user-friendly search experience within the application.