Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[foss/2023b] BiG-SCAPE v1.1.9, HMMER v3.4, FastTree v2.1.11 #21387

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Sep 12, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the update label Sep 12, 2024
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Sep 12, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 12, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21387 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21387 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14251

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2346580046 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/5833655c5393d45d9670cb5253927fc9 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 12, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3128.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/9647ec2b8de7647d51cc3a56f62b0974 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 13, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21387 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21387 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4866

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2348247256 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/0ec1ce5cff43d4441802ffb544c615c1 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel requested a review from laraPPr September 14, 2024 10:13
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 17, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3105.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/03efada30d7b5d1e5fd091a4e0919af7 for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@laraPPr laraPPr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@laraPPr
Copy link
Contributor

laraPPr commented Sep 17, 2024

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@laraPPr laraPPr merged commit 9b49450 into easybuilders:develop Sep 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, 4.9.4 Sep 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants