also install w90spn2spn.x + w90chk2chk.x for Wannier90 3.1.0

[stefan-wolfsheimer]

A user reported that there were two binaries missing:
w90spn2spn.x and w90chk2chk.x

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21383 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21383 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 14341

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2374267572 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f6e7be1693d9f8ebf2df6d9c42a4ec33 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@stefan-wolfsheimer This change should be made consist across recent Wannier90 easyconfigs, so also in Wannier90-3.1.0-gomkl-2023a.eb, Wannier90-3.1.0-intel-2023a.eb, Wannier90-3.1.0-foss-2024a.eb, and Wannier90-3.1.0-intel-2024a.eb, are you up for that?

[stefan-wolfsheimer]

Hi @boegel ,

I can look into the 2024a versions as well. However, there is a problem with the parallel execution of wannier90.x in our installation. Before proceeding, I need to identify and fix it first.

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21383 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21383 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 14624

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2458867626 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/a6b5e5c5b8bd4dfd9c072db1dfa82756 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21383 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21383 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 5191

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2458888645 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/b201ce3418a1d055335e5054ecf0ebc1 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
node3103.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 9.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/818c1a48c8ab2e233c7db292741c391c for a full test report.

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @stefan-wolfsheimer!