Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

copy missing rsem_perl_utils.pm in DETONATE, since it's required by rsem-eval-calculate-score command #20956

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Jul 3, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the bug fix label Jul 3, 2024
@boegel boegel added this to the release after 4.9.2 milestone Jul 3, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 3, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20956 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20956 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13873

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2205644853 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/1338158d170a4399dd4d809e71309892 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel force-pushed the 20240703120246_new_pr_DETONATE111 branch from 95084c3 to 79abc87 Compare July 3, 2024 10:21
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 3, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Jul 3, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3101.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/792cd009abcf717b341dfe171c183371 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20956 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20956 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4507

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2205724584 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/f51343039d5e05a89340e1dbe0df59ac for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Appears that the sanity test command failed on jsczen3 - not immediately sure why.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
FAILED
Build succeeded for 5 out of 6 (1 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-el8.cloud.in.bmrc.ox.ac.uk - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/33ab9769e1cacd7c631e142b9319a331 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Same error for me:

== 2024-07-11 15:54:20,612 build_log.py:171 ERROR EasyBuild crashed with an error (at easybuild/base/exceptions.py:126 in __init__): Sanity check failed: sanity check command rsem-eval-calculate-score --help 2>&1 | grep 'rsem-eval-calculate-score \[options\]' exited with code 1 (output: ) (at easybuild/framework/easyblock.py:3663 in _sanity_check_step)

@boegel boegel changed the title copy missing rsem_perl_utils.pm in DETONATE, since it's required by rsem-eval-calculate-score command copy missing rsem_perl_utils.pm in DETONATE, since it's required by rsem-eval-calculate-score command Jul 31, 2024
@boegel boegel changed the title copy missing rsem_perl_utils.pm in DETONATE, since it's required by rsem-eval-calculate-score command copy missing rsem_perl_utils.pm in DETONATE, since it's required by rsem-eval-calculate-score command Jul 31, 2024
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 11, 2024

Problem on jsc-zen3 is this:

[boegelbot@jsczen3c1 ~]$ rsem-eval-calculate-score --help
Can't locate Env.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Env module) (@INC contains: /tmp/boegelbot/software/DETONATE/1.11-GCC-12.3.0/bin /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.32 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.32 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at /tmp/boegelbot/software/DETONATE/1.11-GCC-12.3.0/bin/rsem-eval-calculate-score line 12.

This shows we're missing a Perl dependency here too...

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 11, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20956 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20956 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4850

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2344102821 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 11, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3144.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/2b1d61a068494192908ff46bb73ebd09 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c2.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/4581a97748fb9e84d43a18a05181c995 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Sep 11, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20956 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20956 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14245

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2344123688 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/772cc82ddc167c3345715b71c3ca5418 for a full test report.

@bedroge bedroge merged commit c6f45a8 into easybuilders:develop Sep 11, 2024
9 checks passed
@boegel boegel deleted the 20240703120246_new_pr_DETONATE111 branch September 11, 2024 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants