Add more clarity on member lookup #43932
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Found while updating the feature spec for the feature. This article didn't clearly state that file local types are preferred over other types with the same name in the file where they are declared. Also, the `file` modifier doesn't actually modify the *scope*, rather, it modifies the *visibility*. Update the language to match the speclet definition. Finally, quick edit pass.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found while updating the feature spec for the feature. This article didn't clearly state that file local types are preferred over other types with the same name in the file where they are declared.
Also, the
filemodifier doesn't actually modify the scope, rather, it modifies the visibility. Update the language to match the speclet definition.Finally, quick edit pass.
Internal previews