Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing llm_type based on model in hyperparameters #1675

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

hasinaxp
Copy link
Contributor

@hasinaxp hasinaxp commented Dec 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a method for mapping model types to their corresponding LLM types.
    • Enhanced validation logic for prompt actions to ensure model parameters are correctly handled.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for missing model keys in prompt action data.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases to validate model parameter handling and mapping accuracy.
    • Updated existing tests to incorporate new validation logic.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new static method get_model_llm_type_map() in the DataValidation class to create and cache a mapping between model types and their corresponding LLM types. The validate_prompt_action method has been enhanced to handle model validation more robustly, particularly focusing on checking for the presence of a model in hyperparameters. Corresponding unit tests have been added to verify the new validation logic and model mapping functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
kairon/shared/data/data_validation.py - Added get_model_llm_type_map() static method to create model-to-LLM type mapping
- Modified validate_prompt_action() to include model validation and LLM type assignment
tests/unit_test/data_processor/action_serializer_test.py - Added test_prompt_action_validation_missing_model() test
- Added test_get_model_llm_type_map() test
- Added test_add_llm_type_based_on_model() test
- Updated existing test cases to include new model validation checks

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the code we go,
Mapping models with a magical glow
Validations dance, errors take flight
LLM types now shine so bright!
A rabbit's code, precise and neat 🔍


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab7deae and 36bb423.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • kairon/shared/data/data_validation.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • kairon/shared/data/data_validation.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
kairon/shared/data/data_validation.py (2)

12-25: LGTM! Consider adding docstring documentation.

The implementation of the caching mechanism and mapping creation is correct. The method efficiently loads the YAML file only when needed and creates a proper mapping between models and LLM types.

Consider adding a docstring to document the method's purpose, return type, and caching behavior:

    @staticmethod
    def get_model_llm_type_map() -> dict[str, str]:
+       """
+       Returns a mapping of model names to their corresponding LLM types.
+       The mapping is cached in class variable model_llm_type_map for subsequent calls.
+       
+       Returns:
+           dict[str, str]: A dictionary mapping model names to LLM types
+       """
        if DataValidation.model_llm_type_map:

93-100: LGTM! Consider improving error message clarity.

The validation logic for hyperparameters and automatic llm_type detection is well implemented.

Consider making the error message more descriptive:

-                    data_error.append("model is required in hyperparameters!")
+                    data_error.append("The 'model' field is required in hyperparameters when llm_type is not provided!")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c529677 and e7aac7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • kairon/shared/data/data_validation.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/unit_test/data_processor/action_serializer_test.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/unit_test/data_processor/action_serializer_test.py (2)

722-799: LGTM! Test coverage is comprehensive.

The test implementations thoroughly cover:

  • Validation of missing model field
  • Model to LLM type mapping functionality
  • Caching behavior with proper mocking
  • Automatic llm_type detection

Line range hint 18-18: Verify the existence and location of the LLM metadata file.

Ensure that the LLM metadata file exists at the expected location.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for YAML files in the repository to locate the LLM metadata file.


Let me check the contents of these YAML files to verify the LLM metadata configuration.


LLM metadata file exists and is properly configured

The LLM metadata file exists at metadata/llm_metadata.yml and contains comprehensive configuration for OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Perplexity models with all required parameters and their constraints. The file in the test directory (tests/testing_data/llm_metadata.yml) also exists as a test fixture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the LLM metadata file

# Check if the file exists and show its contents
if [ -f "$SYSTEM_FILE" ]; then
    echo "System file exists at: $SYSTEM_FILE"
    cat "$SYSTEM_FILE" | grep -A 10 "openai:\|anthropic:\|gemini:\|perplexity:"
else
    echo "System file not found at: $SYSTEM_FILE"
fi

Length of output: 78


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for YAML files that might contain LLM configurations
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "openai:\|anthropic:\|gemini:\|perplexity:" 2>/dev/null || echo "No matching YAML files found"

# Also show the content of any config directories that might contain the file
fd -t d "config"

Length of output: 262


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Show contents of the found YAML files
echo "=== metadata/llm_metadata.yml ==="
cat metadata/llm_metadata.yml

echo -e "\n=== tests/testing_data/llm_metadata.yml ==="
cat tests/testing_data/llm_metadata.yml

Length of output: 12954

@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 self-requested a review December 23, 2024 11:54
@sfahad1414 sfahad1414 merged commit 6dc88e8 into digiteinfotech:master Dec 23, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants