Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial attempts at packaging for OperatorHub / OLM #83

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bradfordcp
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bradfordcp bradfordcp self-assigned this May 8, 2020
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch from 67de3e2 to aba28f1 Compare May 22, 2020 03:43
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch from b9c99a5 to b23e9b1 Compare June 4, 2020 22:15
@bradfordcp bradfordcp added enhancement New feature or request olm Operator Lifecycle Manager labels Jun 25, 2020
@bradfordcp
Copy link
Member Author

This is now up to date with the operator and can successfully deploy versions 1.0.0 and 1.2.0. There are some testing components in place via the operator-sdk scorecard command. It still needs to be wired up to the mage tests.

@bradfordcp
Copy link
Member Author

1.1.0 is skipped due to issues binding port 443 for the validating webhook. The CSV files indicate that 1.1.0 should be skipped and upgrades perform as expected.

@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch from c3786ab to 324580f Compare September 21, 2020 15:48
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch 3 times, most recently from ab726d7 to f9e8314 Compare October 26, 2020 05:31
@bradfordcp
Copy link
Member Author

Replaced all the logic here with the new bundle format. Currently this includes all versions from 1.0.0 to 1.4.0. With any luck, the latest iteration will pass certification and we can get this branch merged.

@bradfordcp bradfordcp added this to the 1.5 milestone Oct 26, 2020
@jimdickinson jimdickinson marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2020 23:06
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch from 65ebd34 to d4d7704 Compare January 9, 2021 05:15
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch 2 times, most recently from f3f1379 to ad8da06 Compare February 5, 2021 20:23
@bradfordcp bradfordcp force-pushed the ko-264-olm-integration branch from f41b963 to 2c5f23a Compare March 9, 2021 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request olm Operator Lifecycle Manager
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants