-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add protocol helpers to infer procedure and type #756
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
81a58f8
Add protocol helpers to infer procedure and type
emcfarlane 2004b2e
Return bool for indicitaing validity
emcfarlane 74290d8
Fix validation of empty method or service name
emcfarlane 8810d37
Fix testcases
emcfarlane 5d6a6b4
Check for connect GET query params
emcfarlane 2ad360f
Merge branch 'main' into ed/inferProtocolHelpers
emcfarlane 17f6741
Use constants
emcfarlane 38618d7
Fix invalid test
emcfarlane File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
For
is used to distinguish streams that are to be consumed by the client rather than the handler. So I think theFrom
is better here even tho its not currently in the API.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my mind they are not necessarily synonyms where you'd always use one over another for consistency.
In my mind, the distinction is that
For
in a function name is used when the function constructs a new value that corresponds to its input or even wraps its input;From
is used when the function extracts a value out of the inputs. In that case,From
seems appropriate to me.As far as returning
string
vs.(string, bool)
: another option is to add aProtocolUnknown
constant, so that callers can use a switch and don't need to examine two values. If that approach sounds good, the constant value might need to be the empty string so that an uninitializedPeer
object reportsProtocolUnknown
. WDYT?