Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(clerk-js): Support collecting optional fields in combined flow #4795

Conversation

alexcarpenter
Copy link
Member

Description

When in a combined flow and there are optional fields, move to create step vs moving the verify email to be able to collect the optional fields during the flow.

Resolves SDKI-809

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandbox ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 17, 2024 8:47pm

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2d3c405

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Name Type
@clerk/clerk-js Patch
@clerk/chrome-extension Patch
@clerk/clerk-expo Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@alexcarpenter alexcarpenter merged commit fbb9e0d into main Dec 17, 2024
29 checks passed
@alexcarpenter alexcarpenter deleted the alexcarpenter/sdki-809-support-collecting-optional-fields-on-sign-up branch December 17, 2024 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants